Is there really a God tell me your Opnion (Page 10)

h0nd0: remember the bellhop gave them the 1.. and took 2 he has not given then 1 33.. there is no answer because the writer wanted it that way.. to explain the controversy.. so as a payment the payer pays and the seller sells the discount is only 5 not 3x9.. though the question is difficult to clarify its easy in some amount of time.. the dollar was never in the equation to make a clear answer because it was lost in the payment/discount formula.. you still cant find it.. no matter what you do.. you can only remake the the hypothesis and declare a new summary

h0nd0: same thing God did with us.. re-made the hypothesis to declare a new summary..

ghostgeek: I hate these sorts of questions, I really do. Everybody should have paid $8.3333333333 ... but in reality paid $9. So the Bellhop took $0.666666666 off each of the three people, making $2.

h0nd0: so in establishing this it wasnt simple.. so hate comes into play .. as it did in Gods first world.. yet in Gods designs his mistakes can only be caused by the insult of the hater that rewrites it.. because this is not his original summary design .. hate is in the second design and if the new design is anything like the first 2.. what do you think it will be like? .. just remember how ..down to the tiniest factor we know of there`s still hundreds of mis-understandings.. even vacuum between object is a source of fruition for new awareness.. like the speed of light just out of reach.. but in all reality God didnt make a false hypothesis,, the formula was changed..

ghostgeek: Fortunately I don't have to worry about whatever it is you're trying to say because it seems to involve God, and I don't believe in God.

h0nd0: thatss your choice.. there`s the knowledge that god was her before history and no man can prove it or the recognition history has to prove god for you.. which is your choice.. i know by asking for answers to releb\vent questions that the only answers that i could possibly get came from him and no ont else i could not get those answer on those exact moments without the knowledge of him to connect the two..

jkent99: hOndO Is Right

ghostgeek: It is my considered opinion, yes, after reflecting on the fact that science in no way corroborates the ancient holy texts concerning the creation of the world.

ghostgeek: The biblical account of creation is, quite simply, wrong. Whatever process brought the universe into existence most definitely occurred way, way, before 4004BC.

h0nd0: lol.. like i said dna evolves..the adam that we consider as the first human was just the first human that ever had a spiritual bond and documented relationship with the God we are talking about.. science can prove that there were other humans that were never talked about..or documented as spiritual. how long do you think it took for neanderthals of become Homo sapiens? since they have become extinct by way of advancement.. , and also how long do you think it took for Homo erectus. to become a Homo sapien? since Homo sapiens name itself means "wise person" in latin.. otherwise known as Hsapien.. now then there was a time when development had to happen but the people of all but one single hominid began with adam.. the first "wise person".. or the first guru.. or the first chieftain, also meaning homo (genitive hominis) man human being.. and all subspecies certainly you wont find a neandersapien.. the traits of the neanderthal may be in a sapian but not the other way around proving the advanced genetic formula attains the superior position.. anyway.. at the extinction of all other species the only one surviving to our knowledge was adam.. just for adam alone to be able to experience spiritual awareness took an evolution of its own.. but that was the plan.. the serpent was most likely hallucinated by eve after eating the poisonous fig.. but hey the stories had to be entertaining back then right?and the devil exist but prolly tainted the fruit. for the new show right? like watching the johnny carson show or jackie gleason.. or a live broadcast of the drunk queen of england after a smashing party .. but its all we know as sapiens.. live with it.. its real.. its only been 2200 years since moses and look at our progress.. they been talking about this very issue for that long and we still believe it.. evolution is a fact but the story of our true beginning in its proven state still exist in the same way. just with more pretense to submit to God 2nd plan..remember noah was born within 100 years of the death of adam.. so the flood was between noah and moses moses was born 300 years before jesus..so the flood came in a windo of mirror time something like we are now.. 2100 years... no time of life is accurate because carbon dating dioxide evaluations can be off by semi-known events like drought , or extreme moisture changing carbon elements,, time itself is a theory.. no one can travel back through time.. one reason is because the light and the spot in the galaxy that time happened would have to be found precisely and if you could but you cant because light for time moves away from there.. and we need to be made of a substance like light in order to travel in time.. we all know that cant happen.. there`s no space exodus give it up.. wont happen..

ghostgeek: No space exodus? How did that get in here?

You do know that Yuri Milner is spending $100 million on a probe that could travel to Alpha Centauri within a generation, and he's recruited Mark Zuckerberg and Stephen Hawking to help.

h0nd0: the 3 stooges? really.. mo larry and curly .. i guess that money i back in the system.. for the lottery .. just summarizing the insane quests of man is how that got in here,,

ghostgeek: May I make a suggestion. Just check up when Moses was supposed to have been legging it around the desert. 2200 years since Moses would put him doing walkabout in about 200 BC.

calybonos: Math is hard.

Harder than following h0nd0 histrionics.

ghostgeek: Yes, I find it tough as well since I lost my abacus.

h0nd0: 323 BCE to about 146 BCE.. puts him born 322 years befor jesus,,or give or take 34 years till present .. The system uses BCE as an abbreviation for "before the Common (or Current) Era" and CE as an abbreviation for "Common Era". and now with the added 2016 AD which is a calendar era that is often used as an alternative naming of the Anno Domini system ("in the year of the Lord", abbreviated AD .. so that means 34+147=170 bce +2016 close to 2200 are you adding? and following?

h0nd0: this has nothing to do with the subject anyways.. same issue from you.. a "broken record"

h0nd0: why are we doing chrithmetics?.. is it because most all knowledge comes from Christianity.. like our calendar acceptance.. or documentation of the known languages.. or the fact that Jewish people have a think orientated philosophy... and it bares a 7 day week on the calendar or is it merely the thought they believe their God.. is the only God?.. if you don`t believe there is a God then you have nothing to contribute to these forums what so ever.. unless you know a fact, but don`t use christian facts to ascertain your own fact, that`s unscrupulous .. and precarious ..

calybonos: "Is there really a God tell me your Opinion"

Tough question to prove one way or the other, but it sounds pretty straight forward to me.

calybonos: Congratulations.
One of your comments has finally managed to peak my interest.

Now when you said;

"don`t use christian facts to ascertain your own fact, that`s unscrupulous .. and precarious .."

Are you implying that Christian facts somehow differ from the facts of Non-Christians, and are therefore immune to, or exempt from, examination to either support or refute a given hypotheses?
And engaging in the practice of judging said purported Christian facts by the same criteria as any other proposition, is unscrupulous, or unethical?

Or, are you just speaking for a jealous god, in which case begs the question;

Why didn't he hire James Earl Jones or Morgan Freeman instead?

h0nd0: neither i stated.. are you dense.. that christian intellect has gained support throughout the world as a or the medium to acquisition time and facts,, so if there are outside facts from a different source.. or time line show some proof there is no God through that.. or is it too hard?

calybonos: I still say God should have go ne with Freeman or Jones.

At least when they try to insult you, it's believable.

h0nd0: if your dense its because your thick headed and dont see what has already been told to you, thats not my problem its yours.. no insult to me.. or at you.. from me,, its youre insulting yourself,, by throwing useless facts into the demographics to the make-up of this conversation.. .. give testimony about your reasons.. why dont ask me about it or mine.. ive decared my reasons.. im waiting for true ones from you people to counter.. how didnt God effect you.. is what im waiting for.. is it that hard?

h0nd0: ive mentioned many things that God .. the christian God has touched in the world.. the worlds time and calendar, philosophy , my life, many baptized peoples lives, history, what have you offered as untouched in you world?

calybonos: If "you're" dense...not your.

As for the rest, well, you can't really expect to be taken seriously after an opening salvo like that, now can you?

Will someone puleeeeease get Morgan on the phone?