The Red Revolutionist Renaissance Academy (Page 2) junyabee: IMPULSE is spontaneous and inherent. Will as a cognitive awareness for something is mediated by the mental and physical navigation to that some-thing  DIAMONDfire: i don't argue that is not scientifically correct. but personally i have always experienced life reactions as an 'intuitive response' and if i could say some kind of magic occurring concurrently to the reactions that really governed the efficacy of them. junyabee: Unself-conscious or cognizant awareness?? Gut sense of foreboding?Subjective, so quite possible DIAMONDfire: i take it you mean free will is just another concept to be assimilated and is part of the cosmic plan. what about malice motive and intent in respect to crimes. without free will no crime is committed. is free will just a legal term? but without it we would be nevertheless lost. junyabee: Social overlays brand the non-premeditative and impulsive by the norms of the times.. Once we are conscious of our actions, no matter the intent, we've taken free will, detached from instinctual will DIAMONDfire: conscious of our actions?? is that a puffed up statement? i think Kant was right free will is the right to life in a sense. why is the question. am i naive? junyabee: Having a conscientious intent of the knowable is the defining liability and culpability for an admittable free-will.. Just reacting from some prior presumption has the shading of hubris/ignorance-even arrogance. One might culturally be held responsible, as far a some spiritual/moral culpability one could argue "They know not what they do.."
(Post deleted by DIAMONDfire ) DIAMONDfire: if they know not what they do; it defies the law of free will. i would say it is a defence but in metaphysical reality we all act permanently. free will is an admission. even setting aside the biblical basis. Indian philosophy says all thought is manifest. free will might be a theosophical term but sets a fundamental rule. is it god's word? junyabee: 'Statutory free will', metaphysically=for any act done As far as the individua,l for a contextual observer, there'd be a nuanced categorization junyabee: For those who exist in the myopic caste of the insular granular consciousness they will have the "rewards" of that circumspection. Better than the 'Declarations' "equals", the fraternal extensions twitter.com/JacobinTrotsky/status/1318762865197711361 DIAMONDfire: is the fact that rhetorical means are used so widely relevant to the fact that we are behind in civilisation? or is that a standard. DIAMONDfire: the question is is rhetoric greater than bland conversation? or rule? rhetoric is an art in the sense that it is a created act. conversation based on reality is quite dead in a leadership role. these are the mores we've left behind for an advanced age? junyabee: Rhetoric of the empirical interfacing engagement, than the escape to a mirage/myth Internationalism=the extension of Populist Cosmopolitanism NOT for elite-transnationals. The extrapolation of the multicultural, presuburbia tenements in the urban centers where thru good/bad times people learned benign transactionalism of mutual survival/destruction Jacobin-Trotsky Populist Harpy There was living for what might be, not a status quo of not enough for all but the privileged. The commerce of pluralistic aspirations existing with the tensions/hopes of the unique/idiosyncratic diversity. What's been missing in the insular, monolithic cultures away from the urban centers they escaped for a myth from the challenge of getting-along, despite not going-along DIAMONDfire: do you mean to say that without influence (rhetoric) one is naturally inclined to escape to mirage/myth? and the interfacing empirical engagement is the constitutional arrangement. junyabee: Rhetorical influence is the seasoning, the yeast added to the secular manifestation to provide a more robust result which the secular by itself isn't structured to be | Education Chat Room Similar Conversations |