dickslapyourforehead the real slim DEEPy: mesasage to rod: rod, i admit that i pushed the envelope with the username "dickslapyourforehead", but i can prove that, at least according to the law in my jurisdiction, it is NOT obscenity. to determine obscenity, ccording to a 1973 us supreme court ruling, it must pass the 3 prong "miller test". 1. whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards", would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, 2. Whether the work depicts/describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law, 3. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value while it may meet the first criteria, it does not meet the second because a consentual cockslap is not a legally defined sexual act. it also fails to meet the third criteria, for it HAS artistic value, that being, comedic and entertainment value. i understand that it is quite difficult for you to accept that users run around with names like "dickslapyourforehead", but, you must clearly see that this fails to reach the level of obscenity. pl;ease message me back about this misunderstanding with any applicable canadian or local laws, or please consider my verifiable and rational appeal to the deletion of the account nicknamed "dickslapyourforehead". thank you for your objective consideration of this matter deep (Edited by the real slim DEEPy)  TheOnlyQueen: Don't Y'all love censorship? I know I do. Especially, when it is as ridiculous as this.  (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff )  calybonos: Of course Wire is free,is anybody so naive as to believe that if Rod thought he could charge us that he wouldn't? That enough people actually would 'stay and pay'? Wire is not offered up to as like manna from heaven that is given out of grace in return for sunday worship folks, We,the members are the actual 'product'......get a grip on reality people ȾrutħÂƞᵭßeŧrãyąŁ: Just saw this in a room.. here appears his true intent. deep: but im trying to incite people to report themselves so the mots thenk WWIII is goning on deep: they wopnt do it, they are no fun LoupBelle: why would someone want to report themself? deep: well, dont tell them either, this shits too good deep: to blow up the report box, cause mass hysteris and try to lure rod into the chatrs eat_the_lemons: deep i don't think she wants to take part eat_the_lemons: and i don't blame her deep: better that shes neutral than she tell s admin to not feed the troll (me) the real slim DEEPy: wqell, i was gonna let em off easy with a trolling, but now im gonna expect a full reenatatement of dickslapyourforehead.  Keres: Yeah, I saw you go on about it in my room and I think that the name would be better if it were properly spelled.... "rod, i admit that i pushed the envelope with the username "dickslapyoiurforehesd"" Seifeerr: Ironic how you don't even follow the rules here, Merc. And tend to make up your own. Did you ever look up the definition of power hungry? Furthermore, this is an adult website. Why is it censored so much? Adults are offended by the word "dick" now? Where do these adults live, under a rock? Sebbyyy =): You can't have genitals, racism, or anything else considered "offensive" in a name. Learn how to read the rules Falcon, oh nvm, how can you read the rules when you're banned?  (Post deleted by staff ) the real slim DEEPy: christian, bibnle, gay, muhammed, jesus, darwin. i could go on forever. everything offends at least ONE person. yellow, pink, black, cracker. almoset everything can be used as an insult. where do we draw the line?  Astarael: About that line, I didn't mean to, and I'm sure it can be fixed, but, ermmm, I had this eraser and I was trying to get rid of a smudge and, well, the long and short of it is. The line's gone. the real slim DEEPy: and i will point out that everyone i came across thought the name dickslapyourforehead was hilarious, except CandyVonBan, whom i hear is offended by the mere presence of males in the same chatroom as her. so we are to go by the standards ote most oten user to get banned daily when we define offensive? no normel person is offended by a dickslap, instead it makes them laugh. how bout we take a vote and see if anyone but CandyVonBan is offended? the real slim DEEPy: leaving the standards up to candy would make any christian male name grounds for account deletion. your arguemnt is a slipperry slope. (Post deleted by staff ) the real slim DEEPy: a dickslap is not pornographic, it would be "R" rated, not "X" rated. look, this wouldnt be an issue if i hadnt been so careful when i chose it to make sure it was pushing but NOT EXCEEDING the envelope. if canadian law considers frontal male nudity by itself as pornogrophy, thaen i stsnd corrected, but i can only be prosecuted for US law, thus i dont know canadian law. the real slim DEEPy: i have sent ot to rod, he refuses to respond, thus allowing for speculation to continue Tink: Seriously, is this really such a profound issue that you need to argue it? You can't use the name. How many times would you like to be told? the real slim DEEPy: it doesnt violate the rules. admin is operating in a arbitary and capricious menner, and this is commonplace. FOR EXAMPLE we cant call gays f*^s (not that i would) but what of using the term "homophobe" for a christian? the word "homophoobe" insinuates that the christian is "deviant" and "irrational" ("phobia", and is merely an ad-hominem logical fallacy which attempts to win an argument without making an argunent. NOW, WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF A USER CALLED A HOMOSEXUAL "deviant" "mentally ill" ect... ionstead of followingf the rules as written, they aqre being bent to fit the preferrence of certain favored sides. Tink: Honestly, you come across as a person that just wants to argue. In fact, I imagine you will argue about anything. Tink: Did you have issues as a child following rules at school and home? Seriously, I am studying this and I find it fascinating. | Off Topic Chat Room Similar Conversations |
