Discrimination against Smokers? (Page 5) Mask Of Dionysus: Both marijuana and tobacco are natural plants that grow in many parts of the world. The plants themselves are not dangerous, it is all the additives that they put in it, that is. Dennae: Have to disagree Jack. Ask anyone that has had known someone that died in a drunk driving accident. Or how many times a barmaid has been sexually assaulted by a patron. Or a bouncer who has been king hit by a drunk at 2AM. nellie77: What about the lazy workers that smoke in the toilets lol make me laugh cause they want two smokes instead of one, gotta laugh its an addiction to some and others maybe a social thing... Comrade_: If you want to make it personal then, How often does a smoker depend on their cigarette breaks, Charlie? Realistically these employers see it as counter-productive, not all employers will but given the job it can be. Mask Of Dionysus: Oh now, Jack, that is silly! How about all those women that are SO concerned with their appearance that they are in the washroom every 15 minutes to touch up.......... Comrade_: Disagree on what? Alcohol in itself isn't dangerous, it is the amount. Marijuana smoking do cause accidents (the research is there), second-hand smoking kills. OCD_OCD: As was stated earlier, are cigarette breaks more counter-productive than surfing the internet while at work? Again, common sense, personal responsibility and decency would go a long way to solving the problem. Mask Of Dionysus: OK, you obviously do not know women well Every 15 minutes or so, they are in the washroom touching up. Dennae: Weird thing about the makeup touch up. Most loose powders, mineral powders, eye liners and rouge/blush contain cadmium and cadmium compounds. Cadmium is a Level 1 carcinogenic harlett: having make-up free skin is better.....for the skin...a little eye make up,light lip stick in the day time.....leaving all that heavier jazz for later in the evening.........when it makes sense...too be wearing any ..........is my motto.... Charliebug: I think a better discriminatory ad placement would say " Fridge raiders, microwave hoggers, newly pregnant can't-talk-about-anything-else shirkers, and people who would screw your significant other at the Christmas party need not apply" Dennae: Don't forget the "gossips at the water cooler or coffee machine" Uh oh or the facebookers and Wire addicts LMAO Mask Of Dionysus: ahhh no no no, Denn.......us evil smokers do it in private amongst each other while smoking Mask Of Dionysus: don't even bother with it LOL.......my brothers forced me to sign up and now, i go there once in a blue moon LOL TactiC4lTurtle: It all depends on the job, if the job prohibits you from doing something in order to keep a safe environment, or requires you to have certain abilities and you cannot comply then you do not need to apply. I don't know what that online ad was for but I can see the absolute no smoking on premises rule if you work at a plant where they handle volatile chemicals/explosives. In my opinion, If the employer's criteria has a huge impact on your ability to complete the given tasks then it's not discrimination. OCD_OCD: If I want to know what someone is doing, I'll call them or see them. If they want to know what I'm doing, they can call me or see me. I'm not going to watch them live their lives vicariously through their Facebook. It's just so....reality tv-ish. | Off Topic Chat Room Similar Conversations |