9 11------ The Planned Govt Crime and Con on the Public lori100: The illuminati controls the movie and music industries, the appearance of the date 9 11 in movies and other media is no accident, they are aware of how to manifest future events , and advertising their future crimes is one way to make sure it will happen. --------------- ----------------- Film: Gremlins (1984) Time: 01:08:58 Scene: Zach Galligan gets into his Volkswagen Beetle with Gizmo and successfully starts the engine. He turns the radio on and the red indicator is sitting between 9 and 11. //////////////////////////// Film: Independence Day (1996) Time: 00:45:33 (Special Edition) 00:41:22 (Theatrical Version) Scene: As Air Force 1 evacuates the President and his family, Jeff Goldblum sets a laptop up to watch the countdown. When the camera cuts to a close-up one of the ticks is 9:11:01. ---countdown to 9 - 11-01, EXACT date. ////////////////////-------Film: The Peacemaker (1997) Time: 01:28:42 Scene: George Clooney and Nicole Kidman are in pursuit of a Yugoslavian terrorist who disembarks at New York's JFK Airport. Stepping off the escalator Clooney anxiously looks around and behind him are desks 9 and 11. //////////////////////////---------Film: Enemy of the State (1998) Time: 01:28:06 Scene: Gene Hackman takes Will Smith to his compound from where they locate Jon Voight's personal details on the computer. Gene Hackman states, 'Reynolds, Thomas Brian. Born 9-11-40'. //////////////////////----------------- Film: Rugrats in Paris (2000) Time: 00:02:22 Scene: Struggling to dance at a wedding ceremony Chuckie's shoelaces get tangled. He counts along with the beat, 'Nine, eleven, twenty…' //////////////////////-------------Film: Traffic (2000) Time: 00:02:17 Scene: In the opening sequence a drug van is pulled over and seized. When the boxes of drugs are removed 911 is written on each of them. ///////////////////-----------Film: The Patriot (2000) Time: (1) 00:03:25 (2) 00:03:59-0:4:33 Scene: (1) Mel Gibson weighs a chair he has made. He says 'Nine pounds, eleven ounces. That's perfect. Perfect'. (2) Taking it down he sits on it, but it collapses under his weight. Upset he throws it against a wall where other chairs he has made lie in pieces. (Edited by lori100) (Post deleted by lori100 ) lori100: 9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Burns also served. [Utne] According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down." The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites." Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end" security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards. The Dulles Internation contract is another matter. Dulles is regarded as "absolutely a sensitive airport," according to security consultant Wayne Black, head of a Florida-based security firm, due to its location, size, and the number of international carriers it serves. Black has not heard of Stratesec, but responds that for one company to handle security for both airports and airlines is somewhat unusual. It is also delicate for a security firm serving international facilities to be so interlinked with a foreign-owned company: "Somebody knew somebody," he suggested, or the contract would have been more closely scrutinized. As Black points out, "when you [a company] have a security contract, you know the inner workings of everything." And if another company is linked with the security company, then "What's on your computer is on their computer." [American Reporter] A heightened WTC security alert was lifted on 9/6/2001... The World Trade Center was destroyed just days after a heightened security alert was lifted at the landmark 110-story towers, security personnel said yesterday [September 11]. Daria Coard, 37, a guard at Tower One, said the security detail had been working 12-hour shifts for the past two weeks because of numerous phone threats. But on Thursday [September 6], bomb-sniffing dogs were abruptly removed. [NY Newsday] ...there was a power down in WTC 2 the weekend before 9/11... On the weekend of 9/8, 9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2, the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical supply for approx 36 hrs from floor 50 up... "Of course without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers' coming in and out of the tower." [WingTV] (Post deleted by lori100 ) lori100: missile hit the pentagon, no wings showing, hole too small for jet, no bodies, luggage.....-------- lori100: _date 9 11 shown again and again in movie scenes, EXACT date 9-11-01 shown in the movie "The Matrix' ------- no accident, planned  (Post deleted by Jokerswiild84 ) lori100: consciouslifenews---------- Recap of the above video, from ae911.org website: [21] WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise that was not hit by an airplane, exhibited all of the characteristics of a classic controlled demolition with explosives: 1.Rapid onset of collapse 2.Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building’s destruction 3.Symmetrical “structural failure” – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration 4.Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint 5.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds 6.Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional 7.Foreknowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY In the aftermath of WTC7′s destruction, strong evidence of demolition using incendiary devices was discovered: 1.FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples 2.Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly qualified witnesses 3.Chemical signature of the incendiary thermite found in solidified molten metal, and dust samples WTC7 exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire: 1.Slow onset with large visible deformations 2.Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3.Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4.High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never collapsed. The Twin Towers’ destruction exhibited all of the characteristics of destruction by explosives: 1.Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration 2.Improbable symmetry of debris distribution 3.Extremely rapid onset of destruction 4.Over 100 first responders reported explosions and flashes 5.Multi-ton steel sections ejected laterally 6.Mid-air pulverization of 90,000 tons of concrete & metal decking 7.Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like clouds 8.1200-foot-diameter debris field: no “pancaked” floors found 9.Isolated explosive ejections 20–40 stories below demolition front 10.Total building destruction: dismemberment of steel frame 11.Several tons of molten metal found under all 3 high-rises 12.Evidence of thermite incendiaries found by FEMA in steel samples 13.Evidence of explosives found in dust samples The Twin Towers exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire: 1.Slow onset with large visible deformations 2.Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires) 3.Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel 4.High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer-lasting fires have never collapsed. Larry Silverstein, lease-holder of the WTC complex, admits WTC7 was pulled down (via control demolition) Larry Silverstein was the lease-holder of the WTC complex who made over 7 billion dollars on insurance claims due to the destruction of the WTC buildings. [22] During an interview in 2002 for the PBS documentary America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero, Mr. Silverstein said this about the fate of Building 7 on 9/11: “I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, ‘We’ve had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.‘ And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” Note that the word ‘pull’ is industry jargon for taking a building down with explosives. Here’s the video clip of Silverstein making the above statement: lori100: consciouslifenews------- The BBC Reports Collapse of WTC 7 (Solomon Building) Fifteen Minutes Before it Happened If you have any doubts about the destruction of Building 7 being pre-planned, then watch the BBC’s Jane Standley report the collapse of WTC7 (Solomon Building) fifteen minutes before it occurred, while it appears standing behind her in this news clip: How could have the WTC buildings been rigged with explosives? Obviously, al-Qaeda terrorists could not have obtained access to the buildings for the enormous number of hours it would have taken to plant the explosives. But, it turns out that there is a very simple explanation: Marvin Bush (the brother of George W Bush) and Wirt Walker III (Bush’s cousin) were the principals of the company in charge of security for the WTC. [25] If the president was involved (which we will establish below), then it’s not a stretch to believe that he had some influence on his brother and cousin. -----------------CNN Reporter: “There is NO Evidence of a Plane Having Crashed Anywhere Near the Pentagon” Jamie Mcintyre, CNN’s senior Pentagon correspondent at the time, was at the Pentagon shortly after it was hit. Here’s what he reported: “From my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon… The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse. Even though if you look at the pictures of the Pentagon you see that the floors have all collapsed, that didn’t happen immediately, it wasn’t until almost about forty-five minutes later that the structure was weakened enough that all of the floors collapsed.” Watch Mcintyre’s CNN report: USAF Witness: There was “a strange lack of visible debris…moments after impact” In case you are thinking that Mcintyre arrived on the scene after the massive amount of Boeing 757 debris had been removed, Karen Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (retired) wrote that there was a lack of debris moments after impact. Kwiatkowski, who was an Air Force Lieutenant Colonel employed at the Pentagon on 9/11, was a contributor to a book titled 9/11 and American Empire Intellectuals Speak Out, in which she wrote that there was “a strange lack of visible debris on the Pentagon lawn, where I stood only moments after the impact. . . . I saw . . . no airplane metal or cargo debris.” [27] ---------------You Can’t Fit a Boeing 757 into Hole that is Only 16 Feet Wide Watch this 10-minute segment of the outstanding Italian documentary titled Zero: An Investigation into 9/11, which addresses many of the serious problems with the official account of what happened at the Pentagon: The discrepancies that are addressed in the above video include the following: ■There is no airplane debris visible anywhere in front of the Pentagon. Examples of what you would expect to see at a plane crash site are shown. Captain Russ Whittemberg, a pilot with over 30 years in military and civil aviation, said: “I have been at some accident investigation sites in the Air Force. And I have never come across any accident scene where there is no tell-tale evidence of the plane that crashed.” ■There is no evidence that either the airplane engines or the wings impacted the building. Instead, we are supposed to believe that the 38 meter (125 feet) wide Boeing 757 fit into a hole that is only 5 meters (16 feet) wide. We are supposed to believe that the wings folded up like those of a dragon fly and squeeze into the 5 meter wide hole. ■Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What’s going on?” ■One theory is that the Boeing 757 was vaporized due to the speed and the force of the crash. The engines are made of a titanium steel alloy that would not vaporize unless they hit a temperature of 3,286 degrees Centigrade. That did not happen. Plus, the engines would have caused significant damage upon impact. Yet, there is no indication that the engines impacted the Pentagon. ■After a period of time, various photos of airplane debris began to appear in newspapers and on the web did not appear in any photos shown in the days following the event. ■The Pentagon had numerous cameras that had complete and separate recordings of the incident. The FBI was immediately on the scene and confiscated many video tapes from the Pentagon and nearby buildings. Yet only four videos were released after 2006 when FOIA requests compelled them to release them. Only two showed any useful information. But most experts believe the white image in the videos is too small to be a 757. ■The story of how the plane arrived at the Pentagon is absurd – by making a 270 degree turn at a speed of 800 kilometers per hour. It’s aerodynamically impossible to fly a Boeing 757 at 20 feet above the ground for half a mile Please continue watching the next segment of the documentary Zero: An Investigation into 9/11: ■According to the official account, the Pentagon was struck by AA Flight 77, under the control of al-Qaeda hijacker Hani Hanjour. Hanjour was known as “a terrible pilot,” [29] who could not even fly a small airplane. ■An experienced pilot with thousands of hours would probably require 10-20 attempts to pull off the maneuver that was performed with the Boeing 757 on its way to the Pentagon. “You just can’t do that with one of those big airplanes.” –Robin Hordon, flight controller and flight instructor ■AA Flight 77 was lost from radar as early as 8:56 a.m. and then allegedly reappeared 36 minutes later at 9:32 am. According to Danielle O’Brien, an air traffic controller at Dulles International Airport, the plane that showed up on the radar was not Flight 77: “The speed, the maneuverability, the way that it turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that it was a military plane.” [30] ■The official report of the final half mile of Flight 77 before it allegedly hit the Pentagon is aerodynamically impossible. “I challenge any pilot, any pilot anywhere: give him a Boeing 757 and tell him to do 400 knots 20 feet above the ground for half a mile. CAN’T Do. It’s aerodynamically impossible.” – Nila Sagadevan, pilot and aeronautical engineer. ■The alleged hijackers had difficulty flying small aircraft, which means that there is a zero possibility that they could pull off an impossible maneuver on the first try. ----------------Donald Rumsfeld said that a MISSILE was used to damage the Pentagon If no plane hit the Pentagon, then what did? In an interview with Parade Magazine in October 2001 (of which a transcript was posted on the U.S. Department of Defense website, defense.gov), Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was asked “How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?” Rumsfeld replied: “There were lots of warnings… It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.” [32] Note that Rumsfeld indicated that both a plane and a missile were used on the Pentagon, which matches up perfectly with evidence presented the above video, Undeniable Proof a Plane did NOT Hit the Pentagon on 9/11. Timothy Roemer, Former 9/11 Commission Member, said that the Pentagon was “pried open by a MISSILE” In an interview in September 2006 with CNN’s Miles O’Brien, former 9/11 Commissioner member, Timothy Roemer, says that a missile caused the damage to the Pentagon and then quickly corrects himself to line up with the official story. O’Brien: “At any point during this day were you just, in a very base way, afraid?” Roemer: “There was — there were many times, Miles, that you were afraid. You were — you were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night, seeing one of our fortresses pried open by a missile, an airplane, thinking about the number of people that probably died on the plane and on the ground…” ------------------FBI: Alleged Phone calls from Flight 77 on 9/11 by Barbara Olson to Ted Olson did NOT happen The FBI has confirmed that the calls that Ted Olson allegedly received from his wife, Barbara Olson, from the hijacked Flight 77 were a fabrication. The alleged call from Barbara Olson was the only source of information that mentions terrorists with box cutters. Late on 9/11, Olson reported to CNN that his wife had “called him twice on a cell phone from AA Flight 77,” saying that “all passengers and flight personnel, including the pilots, were herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers. The only weapons she mentioned were knives and cardboard cutters.” [37] Ted Olson’s report was critical because it provided the only evidence that AA Flight 77 was still airborne after it had disappeared from FAA radar shortly before 9:00 am. Barbara Olson was a well-known commentator on CNN. The reports of her death in a plane that was hijacked by Arab Muslims and subsequently crashed into the Pentagon were a key factor in gaining support for Bush’s “war on terror.” Ted Olson’s story was shown to be a lie in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the alleged 20th hijacker. In the FBI report on phone call from American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” lasting “0 seconds.” Therefore, according to the FBI, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife from either a cell phone or a phone onboard the plane. [38] ---------------Investigators find no debris from Flight 93 larger than a phone book and debris is spread over many miles “The debris here is spread over a 3 to 4 mile radius which has now been completely sealed off, and is being treated according to the FBI as a crime scene. This is one of those cases where the pictures really do tell the story . . . one of the most horrifying aspects of this is how little debris is visible . . . that’s all you see, just a large crater in the ground, and just tiny, tiny bits of debris . . . the investigators out there, and there are hundreds of them, have found nothing larger than a phone book.” – NBC reporter |
Off Topic Chat Room Similar Conversations |
