The mind of logical individuals doesn't fall prey to sexist, racist, religious ideologies

RoyalTruthJustice: If an individual develops a keen sense of logic, then they do not become; sexists, racists, religious (particularly the big three). Only illogical brains would support sexism, racism, religion. Please provide your arguments, in a mature, respectful, logical manner. Thank you.

theHating: Ummm....

How do you identify this "logical individual"?

zolo2500: All of these are, in fact, easily refutable but I don't want to bring you to tears again.

zolo2500: Your heart is in a good spot though. Be a little historically contextual in your approach, the society cultivated in the modern age bends to your notion though.

zolo2500: Religion is always defendable. Go study. You're grossly wrong. The other two, I could pull out something but I don't care enough to show off on such a tense thing for no reason.

zolo2500: We can talk if you will. I'm willing to work through it with you.

cheea: Yep

zolo2500: Pardon?

zolo2500: My friend. We needn't fight. I know more than you might think. Rest your mind in my hands and I may impress you if not enlighten you. Many walks of life, but only one life to walk. All can observe and know. You never know who might have the answer you need.

zolo2500: #TheBipolarBuddhawashere

RoyalTruthJustice: Update: Clearly racism, sexism, war (particularly those for profits, land grabs, etc), most religions, are illogical for social beings (Homo sapiens) and beings that realize the importance of peace, love, pollution-free planet (for survival of all beings). Responses to this post, often seem to help prove my original points.

RoyalTruthJustice: @TheHating: I outlined ways to identify the "logical" in both the initial post, and particularly the subsequent post (I submitted).

zolo2500: This assertion has too many qualifiers to be worth noting. War and religion are easily refuted. Historical context are important for the others. I can defend these. Clearly, nothing. Go study religion, that is a gaping and disgusting display of ignorance. I will win that gauranteed. The war one? Imagine you're pacifist and get invaded. "Haha we're all dead now make sure you rape and kill my family first." Come on.

zolo2500: I have better arguments, I'm just pointing out this topic is clearly wrong. You're flaunting ignorance. Please stop.

theHating: A logical individual is a person that develops a keen sense of logic. Is that it?

theHating: What would you make of three college students suddenly quitting school and denouncing their citizenship to join ISIS and worship god through assinine social laws?

lori100: is it logical to get rid of non-useful members of society?...could be ....or kill those with defects and bad genetics?...could be......a spiritual experience like an out of body experience is not logical if one doesn't know they exist in multiple dimensions...... anything could be illogical if you haven't learned enough...

lori100: scientists are allegedly logical but many have committed attrocities in the name of science....is that good?

zolo2500: Logical is an absolute trait, true regardless of what you say. A lack of knowledge just makes you ignorant. Scientists have committed atrocities. Very good. So has pretty much every kind of person throughout history. In fact, they're committed pretty much exclusively by people and, with scientists, more often than it is by people other; not the creater, who do the most damage. Chinese like fire works and Nobel used dynamite for mining but it's hard to make a gun work without gunpowder. It's doable though. A couple ways off the top. Your proper point here is: I want balance logic with morality. Unless you're Republican this tends to be true for everyone but they have more green pieces of paper so we have to smile and pretend they say smart things.

lori100: dems are moral? there was no outrage when Obama did the same stuff trump has done...there was no outrage when bill Clinton raped women and Hillary threatened those women.....why haven't the multi-millionaire outraged .dems taken many illegal families to live with them? they can well afford it but refuse to do it........they just hate losing

zolo2500: Democrats are kind of annoying. I watched a house debate once. Republicans had arguments. One Democrat had an argument then the Dems just had anecdotes that were getting way too much attention by being there, some odd ball cases. Outliers don't need a attention of a standing bill, maybe a special committee to handle such appropriation oof emergency funds but not a law. They just be debating and passing things just to do so, some don't even know why they get paid so much or for life.

zolo2500: Modern religion is mostly a social thing dude. That's the benefit and plenty of people running the hierarchy of modern religions don't believe in the mythology. It's about the atmosphere union and ideals. If they believe strongly enough for what they believe, I'm chilling. I'd rather know all the whys though. Stay out of foreign affairs and they don't swing back. America is kind of a trash nation in foreign affairs, we get a little too rough. The war against communism was literally us going into foregn independent nation and mudering entire villages of people because they didn't use pieces of paper to transfer the things they owned. Without those pieces of paper we have less power over them and that's a problem. That is just one fuck up.

zolo2500: So I don't condemn students going to ISIS point blank. The fact they were educated makes me happy.

zolo2500: The over outsourcing of responsibility of internal affairs onto a continuous overarching entity is deeply flawed in my opinion. That is they way it's managed. As is separation by class. Elon and Bill should know and acquaint themselves with their own work force as much as they can I think. Not as a task, but something you just do. It's an all thing. Same goal. Smaller businesses have that charm and to be fair there is less to worry about in some ways. Having to have a body that forces the elites to help the lower classes is a sad commentary. Especially in the modern age. To be truly fair, plenty a lower class men probably doesn't deserve help but it's a problem we all have to solve.

zolo2500: I'm the greatest. I have ordained.

RoyalTruthJustice: Thanks for the responses. Only by communicating can societies grow, learn from each other, solve problems without war, physical fights, and/or unnecessary laws that hurt (sometimes) one side that may have simply required being heard. Leaders of both parties tend to be corrupt, but the Republican side is more apt to help the powerful and rich, while the Democratic side is more likely to give, at least, some help to the poor, working class, minorities, LGBTQ. This keeps all civilians from uniting. One side gets some justified help (black, latino, LGBTQ, working poor, homeless) from the Democratic Party, and the Republicans push back. Supporters of Republican Party are often suffering also but become xenophobic, and/or racist, afraid that those blacks, latinos, LGBTQ are infringing on their (republican supporter) rights. Thus, instead of realizing that the elite actually benefit either way (The food stamps give $ to farmers, food stores, the public housing benefits vendors, kitchen fridge manufacturers and distributors, etc, just as much as those people who would be homeless, plus it hides away the struggling from tourists and from homeless stats as they are temporarily housed in rat infested, etc public housing.).

The bigger problems are that elite control most Fortune 500, Amazon is crushing small business (and some larger ones), big banks get bailouts as the poor and working/middle classes struggle without real bailouts that would lift them out of their state. (Middle class have better support, thus our caste system keeps the weakest at the bottom and as you slowly rise, there is more support, with most support at the top, for the 1% who do white collar crime but rarely any jail time. In fact, their researchers and teams create new tricks, scams (various financing, law, banking, etc) schemes that aren't crimes because: a) They are far more advanced and out maneuver our laws. b) Many of our laws are setup by the wealthy (who have lobbyists at higher numbers, and donate $$ to the politicians) who often turn a blind eye to the scams of the wealthy and help create laws to protect them (sometimes hiding such into bills meant for other purposes.).

Americans typically take one sided approaches to American rules and justices, and never evaluate the grey area nor cross the party lines. Like religion, Americans, unfortunately, have been conditioned to be closed-minded in America and thus