It's the dynamics of thee journey... (Page 2)

junyabee: Difference between reductive resigned/or stoic acceptance, than curiosity of the patterns and coincidences of things

DIAMONDfire: difference is the wheel into the netherworld. not necessarily hell. but an objective dimension.

junyabee: Only if you dare to enter... If you do, you've already accepted that premise as a given possible objective or subjective hallucination. It's the experience, the phenomenology, that matters

DIAMONDfire: one thing that phenomenology certainly is is interpretative. that leaves us with an excessive amount of free will. thats the problem with it?

junyabee: It provides the diversity for the "free will", IF WE CAN HANDLE IT!

DIAMONDfire: i think i'm locked in a philosophical mindframe. i can't divide free will, neither phenomenon. and that for me is raising questions about the 'I'.

junyabee: The 'I' IS the issue. Your seeming dependency away from your aggregated intuitions is your obstruction in having a 'carpe diem' moment with 'free will'.

DIAMONDfire: you say thought is a universe of possibility. and that we can become one with the universe of potentiality through the natural expression of life. that we are obstructed by illusion principally. but the universe has within it black holes of anti-matter. it is constantly destroying and remaking. what can be said for these. are they not an expression of our thought and life.

junyabee: I saw a whimsical tweet, "6 galaxies found trapped in a block hole. Telescope in Chile spotted them. I think that one of the galaxies is The Milky Way, and we are seeing our future. "

I took that thought saying we're see a reflection of ourselves and that the dystopia of the nano and macro are meta-markers of the disintegration of the tangible constructs, BUT...'the Eye of the *black hole* of the needle..' Just as the metaphorical interpretation of that biblical verse ALLOWS FOR PASSAGE OF THE ABSTRACT-THE INTANGIBLE

DIAMONDfire: does the sole source come from the tangible or intangible? i think there is two worlds.

junyabee: Two separate functioning realities, sometime operating on tangent lines

DIAMONDfire: one line to wherever. to suggest there are infinite realities defies reason.

haroldg206: something newcan happen anytime in which i may find it in my best interest to be prepared, can help me find out what i'm capable of, being able to adapt

DIAMONDfire: i think psychologically i am more like a ship at night.

junyabee: Titanic-even discounting the recent article that concurrent atmospherics from the aurora borealis may have interfered with the navigation and the ships communications??

DIAMONDfire: i think we are fighting algorithms nowadays

junyabee: When it's all stripped away, it's the digital metas that under-gird our reality

DIAMONDfire: are you saying that digital metas lie or hide behind the beast of existence?

junyabee: It's architecture. Yes.

DIAMONDfire: and these are calculations of some kind?

junyabee: Representations of the elemental

DIAMONDfire: i thought the unknown principle lied behind the elemental the akasha. and in it would be found the architecture. maybe there are ever fine degrees of the elements? thats another way of looking at it. or are you meaning elemental in a slightly different sense?

junyabee: Those qualities that are the foundational building blocks of the phenomena of existence

DIAMONDfire: is there any such thing?

junyabee: I identify them as a manifestation