An Issue Of Constitutionality (Page 3) (Post deleted by staff )  StuckInTheSixties: Don't go to that website! It's a trap! It's there to infect your computer with malware! Don't fall for it! ( clicks "report" ) (Edited by StuckInTheSixties)  OCD_OCD: Back to the question at hand....Without due process, it would be unconstitutional. Due process means that there is a reasonable expectation that information could be gleaned from tracking that person. Not that they "think" it might work out. The authorities have to do their due diligence and go through the hoops before you can potentially circumvent someone's rights. You can also be dragged in before a Grand Jury and it is their decision whether or not to true bill. It really all depends on the agenda of the person making the decision doesn't it? It many cases it can be used effectively and for the greater good. In other hands, it is unconstitutional and detrimental. That's why we must be very careful who we allow to have such powers. StuckInTheSixties: OCD says: "Due process means that there is a reasonable expectation that information could be gleaned from tracking that person." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process Just because there is "reasonable expectation that information could be gleaned" is not reason enough to abridge a person's Fourth Amendment rights. That generally requires "probable cause." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probable_cause OCD_OCD: My opinion remains the same, though. Abuse of our rights is still in the hands of those given power over us and is something we must closely watch. (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff ) StuckInTheSixties: WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! Don't go to that website! It's a trick! If you go to that website, it will automatically infect your computer with very harmful malware that will wreck your system. WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! WARNING! (Post deleted by staff ) | Politics Chat Room 60 People Chatting Similar Conversations |
