Creationist state funded school- Should it be allowed???? (Page 6) StuckInTheSixties: So if your money went to teach stuff you didn't like, you'd be okay with that, too?  ntrigonometry: Well, it is rather simple, We the people, for the People and Of the People, don't need the electors doing things that we DON"T WANT, so if WANT TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN THAT THEY ARE MORE THAN FREAKING ANIMALS SO BE IT, SPIRIT and ETERNITY LOVE AND PEACE GOD AND CHRIST, what ever we want WE WANT TO BECAUSE IT IS OUR CHILDREN AND OUR MONIES; what part are you not understanding about that? ntrigonometry: You want to complicate add red tape run around changing the text books every year, by all means, go spend monies to teach children things that will change from day to day and year to year, go on, spend monies whatever, go waste ntrigonometry: ahhh the world is coming to an end and you want to say science is not connected to God. You don't make sense.  Blackshoes: Abiogenesis is impossible yet : The theory persist.It's very Interesting how both side claim , that other cannot happen .The fact: both theories are based in Faith .One the faith In God and His word .The other in Man and his words .I could write volumes of information on this subject with mountains of evidence .However; and endless argument will develope without end .I guess the easiest thing to say is that ",Only one can be correct, and the other wrong .It's all faith based yet only one can be true and the other false .As for me I'll take the word of the eye witness to the event .... Seek the truth ,knowledge, and love for one another.. After all the important thing is what happen after all is said and done .I already know . (Edited by Blackshoes) Blackshoes: Most of all science before the common era was ;writened by believers in GOD .The common era stands on the works of the past.. (Edited by Blackshoes)  ReturnOfTheJam: Sure, as long as religion is defined in a broad sense which would also include atheism, and atheism-based articles of faith, including, but not limited to, abiogenesis (unprovable and unfalsifiable), and an ateleological view of evolution. asdic1: faith schools per se should not be allowed,they may be taught about religions,but as far as i am concerned schools are for EDUCATING children,and not indoctrinating them to one or another faith,these are CHILDREN,me personally did not approve of my daughter being christened,it is wrong in my opinion to submit a baby in arms to one or the other religion,she was a baby,she didnt know what day it was,or anything about the world of religion,or anything for that matter,she eventually had to get christened herself,because the church would not marry her if she was not,that was not right as far as i see the situation ntrigonometry: Are you seriously not watching the news? It is as the Bible states. You best get right!  Barbara the Jew: What makes you say think that public school dont indoctrinate your children. They teach evolution as a science which is not realy science. There is no scientific proof or scientic method that proofs evolution! CoIin: The above comments reveal a profound misunderstanding of the nature of science and scientific theories. Barbara - if a rigorous proof existed for any scientific theory, it wouldn't be a scientific theory! Scientific theories, which attempt to describe and explain EMPIRICAL phenomena (i.e. "reality" - not simply manipulation of abstract numbers or symbols like, say, mathematics) are intrinsically unproveable. Imagine playing Cluedo. Know the game? With a limited number of suspects (six?) it's quite possible to prove WITH CERTAINTY the identity of the murderer. Science doesn't work like that; the list of suspects is either infinite or of an unknown size. | Politics Chat Room 80 People Chatting Similar Conversations |
X infinity