Department of Homeland Security plans----------economic collapse, gun control...... (Page 2)

lori100
lori100: The Big Dogs On Wall Street Are Starting To Get Very Nervous | TheSleuthJournal
www.thesleuthjournal.com
Why are some of the biggest names in the corporate world unloading stock like there is no tomorrow, and why are some of the most prominent investors on Wall Street loudly warning about the possibility of a market crash? Should we be alarmed that the
11 years ago Report
0
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: Your copy and paste ended mid-sentence, Lori.

Maybe the "sleuths" were shut off in mid-stream by the Illuminati.
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: at least some will refuse the DHS fema camps........these people know their rights as citizens....
11 years ago Report
1
lori100
lori100:


Missouri Government caught sending Private Data on Gun Owners to Department of Homeland Security
offgridsurvival.com
The Missouri Department of Revenue, who issues concealed carry permits in Missouri, may have been caught transmitting private information on Concealed Carry Permit Holders to the Department of Homeland Security.
11 years ago Report
1
MrCerebral
MrCerebral: I say nah, there's absolutely no need to make stricter gun laws on automatic weapons, nah we don't need that. I say, every person in this country needs at the least, 3 semi automatic weapons at their disposal. Yeah! That's how you solve a problem! You add more of the problem to the problem! Some will say, well, it is are constitutional right to bare arms! Yes, but it also your way of justifying the fact you feel more secure having guns. Just because something was made a constitutional "right", that doesn't mean it was the right thing to do. It may have been the right thing to do back in 1787, but much has changed since then. Anyone with an ounce of a brain should be able to understand that, atleast I would hope

Those who say, well! it's not the guns who shoot the people, it's the people who shoot people!" If the guns were never there for civilians to access to begin with there would be nothing for them to shoot someone else with. You can argue that either way. More guns being produced could of lessened or even been eliminated over the years, but you couldn't eliminate people producing more people.

Now, for those who use their single shot hand guns, shot guns, and rifles for their proper uses such as hunting and target shooting for sport, as do friends and family of mine, I commend them for being responsible, as they should be very responsible. The problem is, and the problem always will be unless something changes, there are more non law abiding gun havers then there is law abiding gun owners.

I've always been perplexed as to why those who are very gun ho when it comes to the 2nd amendment use the possible act of future tyranny as a reason to also bare arms. An act of such has NEVER taken place in the United States. That was Hitler, in europe, not here, and Hitler was a maniac.........Beyond that paranoid driven thought, do those same people really truthfully believe that if every single household in the United States had firearms that we all could defeat the United States Military? Do they really believe that? lol. Now I also wonder if those same people recognize the fact that the soliders who the Government would have to depend on to carry out such an act are the same soliders who are civilians of this country, with many friends and family members across the entire country. So they would not assist the Government in carrying out an act of "tyranny". Who's going to carry it out then for them then, are the goverment officials going to fly those fighter jets and drive those tanks and shoot the artilery and weapons themselves?

Insecurity within and paranoia is what drives those thoughts. Insecurity and paranoia is what has those individuals pulling the 2nd amendment card all the time to combat those who just don't agree with their far fetched ideology. Otherwise they wouldn't give a damn about the 2nd amendment.
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: lol...it is 'bear' arms......not 'bare' arms........and look at posts here and 'is it possible' thread, and illum lorry thread.........educate yourself about what the govt is doing........ as for no tyranny from govt yet.............
11 years ago Report
1
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: Lori is willfully forgetting that the protesters at Kent State had turned violent and had already started burning buildings. It's not a reason to shoot them, but it's not as if they were lined up against a wall and shot while they were waving flowers and candy around.
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Thomas Jefferson
11 years ago Report
0
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: The uber-right, conspiracy mongering bunker dwellers are no better than the uber-left fear mongering socialists.
11 years ago Report
0
MrCerebral
MrCerebral: bear, yeah my bad. It was really late when I typed that all out. "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Thomas Jefferson"

Tyranny is an act, not a panaroid driven "what if" thought. You're living in 1787, this is 2013
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: tyranny-----arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power--------------------as with DHS acts currently which are increasing........see above video in resisting DHS nazi checkpoints abuse................
(Edited by lori100)
11 years ago Report
0
MrCerebral
(Post deleted by lori100 10 years ago)
lori100
lori100: veteranstoday-------------Homeland Security: The Unanswered Questions-------------There are new reports that DHS acquiring 2,700 light tanks which are especially designed to withstand IEDs of the kind that US forces have encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan. Does DHS anticipate using these in American streets against US citizens–and if so, why? -----------------------------Earlier articles have reported that DHS has acquired more than 1.5 billion rounds of .40 hollow point ammunition, which is not even permissible for use in combat under the Hague Treaty of 1899. For what conceivable purpose does DHS need this vast stockpile of munitions? -------------------These purchases and those of 7,000 fully automatic assault weapons are reported to have been made with no-bid contract was justified due to an “unusual and compelling urgency” alleging a shortage of bullets threatening “substantial safety issues for the government”. What would that be? ----------------------The public has long known of the existence of more than 300 FEMA camps distributed across the county and we have noticed that DHS is advertising for personnel to man them. Since there are no obvious natural disasters that might warrant them, what is their purpose? -----------------------Special arrangements have been made for the use of funeral homes and other facilities to process large numbers of bodies of US citizens, should an emergency arise that would overwhelm hospitals and other care centers. What is the purpose of making these arrangements? -----------------------Since DHS has no foreign commitments, is there any reason to doubt DHS is acquiring these vast stocks of ammunition, these light tanks, and 30,000 drones, while making these special arrangements and manning FEMA camps for anticipated operations against US citizens? -----------
Conclusion: The United States is planning for massive civil war, involving massive casualities, with the citizens of the United States. Consider the evidence. There is no way around it. That’s what’s happening.

(8) A subcommittee of the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Intelligence has issued a report based upon its review of 680 “fusion center” reports from 2009-10 that showed no indications at all–NONE–of domestic terrorist activity. So why is DHS targeting Americans?
---------------------Groups that have been reported to be on the DHS “terrorist watch list” include militias, veterans, 9/11 Truth seekers, and critics of US foreign policy, who have been exercising their rights under the Constitution. Why do groups like these belong on any “watch list” by a federal agency? -------------------The creation of DHS under the PATRIOT Act appears to be modeled upon the East German “Stasi” and to reflect the dissolution of the United States of America into a fascistic military-police state. Wouldn’t it be better for our civil liberties for DHS to be disbanded? ------------------The reported massacre at Sandy Hook appears to some to have been a staged event that even involved the use of actors, which was designed as a “psy op” to reduce access to the weapons Americans need to oppose an assault by DHS. Was DHS involved in Sandy Hook? -------------------------The last question: Is DHS planning to conduct a massive civil war against the American people? What other conceivable purpose can there be for acquiring this vast stockpile of illegal .40 calibre ammunition, 2,700 light tanks, 300 FEMA camps and 30,000 drones when there is no domestic terrorist threat?
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: Cypress crisis, Europe next, American after that.....the wheels are in motion.........
(Edited by lori100)
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100:


Federal government purchases two million doses of smallpox drug in preparation for bioterrorism atta
www.naturalnews.com
Federal government purchases two million doses of smallpox drug in preparation for bioterrorism attack
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: "Gun registration is not enough" (Attorney General Janet Reno, 12-10-93) —Associated Press


"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of private firearms
is the goal"--Janet Reno

11 years ago Report
1
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: 10 years ago. Didn't happen then. Isn't going to happen now. I'd have to care enough to look up the quote to see if anything was left out of the quote in order to advance your fearmongering agenda.
11 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: DHS INSIDER UPDATE: IT HAS BEGUN---------------Much like my high-level source within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security outlined in a series of interviews beginning last year, the orchestrated collapse of the U.S. dollar and the entire world’s economic system has begun. ------------------------Based on the events in Cyprus, it should be quite clear to even the most vocal critic of the legitimacy of the information provided to me by my source within the DHS as published on this web site is no longer at issue. The U.S. dollar, the backbone of world currencies and the proverbial firewall preventing the erosion of our national sovereignty, is the ultimate target of a takedown by the global banking interests controlled by a handful of banks and families of the “royal elite.” ---------------According to the most recent information provided to me from my source within the Department of Homeland Security known as “Rosebud,” the final preparations are being made to deploy heavily armed federalized forces onto the streets of America. They will be deployed under the pretext of “restoring and maintaining order from the chaos brought about by the economic collapse,” adding that “many will demand and embrace their deployment on the streets of America. They will get what they ask for, and more.”

Much like the security theater we have seen following the attacks of 9/11, we will be subjected to the jack-booted control of a federal army whose allegiance is not to the American people, but to the very architects of the chaos.

“This is the reason that drones are flying over U.S. cities and farmland, and gun control legislation is on the fast track for complete implementation,” stated this source. “How can people look at the situation in Cyprus and not think it won’t happen here? It will, and the blowback will be unlike this country has ever seen. Surveillance, disarming the public, and conditioning the people to believe it’s for their own safety is and has been part of the plan all along. Anyone owing a gun will be demonized and described as contributing to the problem.”
11 years ago Report
1
lori100
lori100:


Stockpile: DHS announces second $4.5 million gun purchase in less than a week
www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com
The Examiner - by Dave Gibson On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) posted details of a no bid contract with weapons manufacturer Sig Sauer, worth $4.5 million over the next five yea....






11 years ago Report
1
lori100
lori100:


Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs
www.globalg2.com
Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not
10 years ago Report
0
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: Your copying and pasting is a little sporadic.
10 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100:


Missouri Government caught sending Private Data on Gun Owners to Department of Homeland Security
offgridsurvival.com
The Missouri Department of Revenue, who issues concealed carry permits in Missouri, may have been caught transmitting private information on Concealed Carry Permit Holders to the Department of Homeland Security.
10 years ago Report
0
OCD_OCD
OCD_OCD: Off Grid Survival?
10 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100:


Governor Hickenlooper About To Give Secret Service Power To Arrest Colorado Sheriffs
k99.com
There is a term for what is being talked about yet I can't think of it. Rumor has it though that the Federal government is laying the groundwork to let the Secret Service start arresting Sheriff's for not enforcing new gun control laws; starting with Colorado..


10 years ago Report
0
lori100
lori100: someone has some sense-----------------


Exclusive: Homeland Security deputy to quit; defended civilian Internet role
www.reuters.com
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The second-ranking official at the Department of Homeland Security said she will resign shortly, ending four years as a champion of a civilian-controlled Internet.In an exclusive interview.-------------------------In an exclusive interview with Reuters, Jane Holl Lute, the sole deputy secretary at Homeland Security, said on Monday she would give notice this week and leave to pursue a role in international Internet affairs.

Lute said that she was leaving with the department on a strong footing in Internet matters, with its central role cemented by an executive order on cybersecurity issued by President Barack Obama in February.

The order directs the civilian Department of Homeland Security to steer improvements in protections for private industry, instead of giving the lead to the military's National Security Agency.

The preeminence of Homeland Security in patrolling the Internet is a big change from when Lute arrived there.

"The national narrative on cyber has evolved," she said. "It's not a war zone, and we certainly cannot manage it as if were a war zone. We're not going to manage it as if it were an intelligence program or one big law-enforcement operation."









The participation of the military and intelligence agencies in monitoring the Internet has not been definitively resolved.

The House of Representatives Intelligence Committee plans to consider a bill on Wednesday that critics say would allow direct sharing of company data with the NSA.

Lute's planned exit follows the recent retirement of deputy under secretary for cybersecurity Mark Weatherford and others with expertise.

"Jane Lute was a relentless voice of clarity in helping to define the proper purpose and role of government in securing the Internet," said Google executive Vint Cerf, a founder of the Internet and co-author of the core protocols for Internet transmission.

"DHS can take advantage of some extraordinary talent at NSA, but it's wise for us to keep that under civilian management. That's the way our Constitution says it's supposed to work."

Lute came to the department under Secretary Janet Napolitano from the United Nations, where she served as an assistant secretary-general supporting peacekeeping missions. She worked at the National Security Council under Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton and before that in signals intelligence in the U.S. Army.

Colleagues said her military background helped her stand up against defense officials, including NSA Director Keith Alexander, as they pushed for a greater role.

Speaking privately, these colleagues recalled a meeting in 2011 about expanding a Pentagon pilot program for sharing classified threat information among defense contractors and federal agencies. Lute would not allow it to be expanded unless Homeland Security took control, aides said, and ultimately she prevailed.

"We needed to find a way to share information with the private sector" while preserving civil liberties, Lute said.
(Edited by lori100)
10 years ago Report
0