Should the G-7 join China's New Silk Road

ehartshorn77: President Xi Jinping will be visiting Italy soon. This is a very historic time, but the United States and other G-7 nations jusr slander China's New Silk Road.
The New Silk Road was first proposed by the LaRouche's late Lyndon LaRouche and Helga Zepp LaRouche. The New Silk Road is the largest infrastructure project ever. It is also the biggest war avoidance policy ever. The present Italian government is God sent

The Transatlantic world currently can only tell lies abourt China, saying China has geo political motives, that China is colonizing Africa, that China is getting nations into debt traps. What have institutions like the World Bank and IMF have done for the International Development of the world. They have devalued currencies, fail to increase domestic commerce in nations, organized economies in way so as to display a poor view on man. They have told Ibero America to count Drug crops as part of their GDP. The Transatlantic world only exists as a set back. This is not the first time the Transatlantic world has not listened to China.

In 1922 Sun Yat Sen , China's modern day founder,and advocate of the American System of Political Economy wrote a book called the International Development Of China. He had proposed rail lines going to Cape town and railines going to Europe. Is this not like the New Silk Road?

Sadly the West ignored China and chose WWII instead. What is the Transatlantic system choosing in not supporting China's New Silk Road.

Super Esquire: Ehart, in one sentence tell us what you mean by china's "silk road" policy?

ehartshorn77: The New Silk Road is the biggest war avoidance policy ever.

Super Esquire: China is avoiding war, you think? Didn't the president tell his military "prepare for war?"

ehartshorn77: The New Silk Road is a war avoidance policy if nations join it. The United States and Western Europe are not feeling it. Trump wants good relations with Russia and China, but liberal and neocons in America along with Nato want war with Russia and China. Trump does not.

Super Esquire: What are the principles of the war avoidance policy?

ehartshorn77: Peace can be attained through development, but sadly NATO, conservatives,and liberals would rather have war. They are not trying to do good for the world. I should not have to tell people how much infrastructure the world lacks. The United States alone needs 4- 8 trillions dollars of infrastructure projects. People do not value infrastructure. Neither do they want to finance it. The provate sector never wrote the Declaration of Indpendence, or the Constitution. The people did the government did. Government bears the responsibility on promoting the General Welare and acting to promote the common defense. The commen defense is not just about war. It is about a war on drugs, it is about controlling foreign trade. Free trade needs to bow down to domestic commerce.

ehartshorn77: You are not addressing the New Silk Road. Please address the New Silk Road.

adjusted2jim: Or is it a road thru the triangle that anyone who has any knowledge of the orient knows. Where that triangle is Who really runs that world???

ehartshorn77: hi2jim, it is a land bridge. along the route will be be infrastructure just not rail. There will be pipe lines of oil and gas. There will be several mining ventures launched in areas along the New Silk road. It will go to Europe. currently Europe such as typified by England has rejected it. Italy and other European countries have embraced it. Englnad voiced sophist concernes over the Chinese taking advantage of the countries with loans. They are of the opinion that China will get these countries into a debt Trap. China is out to have the countries in the New Silk Road, increase their conumption and production. The New Silk Road needs to come to the Americas too. If America undere Trump accepts this the president may go down as one of the greartest presidents. The New Silk Road will link five continents together. There will also be a Maritime Silkroad suc as tjhe Kra canal the canal for Nicaragua, expanding the Suez Canal, building new ports too. This is the biggest infrastructure project known to man, and this project is a war avoidance policy, but England would rather have thermo nuuclear war then to see China upbuild civilization.

ehartshorn77: Yes Helga Zepp LaRouche said that. Do you know of the implicationso the United States joining the New Silk Road? This will get all of Ibero America onboard, and Canada. You can call it a trade war. I call it a long negotiation. Trump is not a neo con or a liberal. he just wants fairer trade. Are you denying that the British attacked the New Silk Road. If you are going to act stupid , there is no need to discuss the New Silk Road. If you think the British have done nothing to get the United States to implement insane foriegn than you do not know geo politics.
The British produced the Dossier that had the government investihate what called Russia Gate.
The House of Lords last year said that Trump musrt be a second term president. You should go find out for your self what the Briitsh government thinks of the New Silk Road.

I do not think you understand the Briitsh.

ehartshorn77: You are a fan of the British Empire