What do you really think about the duly elected President Trump? (Page 8)
if you want the truth it was republicans whom with held money for extra equipment and security from Benghazi appropriations to "conserve" the money NOT lives .
I had responded to you but Sandra deleted my response so I will respond to you here on this thread...
Susan Rice appeared as a surrogate for Secretary of State Clinton on five separate Sunday morning news programs on September 16th, 2012 stating it was a video produced in Hollywood by a right-winger which caused the supposed 'riot' in front of the Embassy. However, we now know that was a fallacy and Rice recently said it was a lie to cover the Obama Lybia debacle.
Four career State Department officials were criticized for denying requests for additional security at the facility prior to the attack. Eric J. Boswell, the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security, resigned under pressure, while three others were suspended. In her role as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton subsequently took responsibility for the security lapses.
The desire of the State Department to maintain a low profile in Benghazi has been cited as the reason why the State Department circumvented their own Overseas Security Policy Board (OSPB) standards for diplomatic security. In the aftermath, Clinton sought to take responsibility for the security lapses at Benghazi and expressed personal regret. In her January 2013 testimony before Congress, Secretary Clinton claimed security decisions at the Benghazi compound had been made by others, stating, "The specific security requests pertaining to Benghazi ... were handled by the security professionals in the [State] Department. I didn't see those requests, I didn't approve them, I didn't deny them."
So Keith, for you to say,
".. if you want the truth it was republicans whom with held money for extra equipment and security from Benghazi appropriations to "conserve" the money NOT lives ."
...to blame the Republicans is not accurate in any form.
Hillary and Obama messed up.
An 'undercover recording' of a CNN editorial phone call claims to feature the network’s president, Jeff Zucker, telling staffers to stay focused on covering impeachment of President Trump at the expense of other important news.
OMG. The screws are coming loose over at CNN. Now even CNN employees have had enough since the cover-up of Epstein has come out.
These 'whistleblowers' will not cover for the pedophiles.
BREAKING, Bill Barr S-TRIKES – Adam Schiff Is Shellshocked
Adam is in real trouble now that he has declined all Republican witnesses. His diapers are full of it right now.
Schiff is going to be indicted and will say that it's Trumps' DOJ coming after him.
Good luck with that defense.
Ex-CIA director Brennan backs down from calling Trump's claims of no collusion 'hogwash'
This liar is also going to be hauled in front of a grand jury for lying especially to the public.
Devil, your attacks on those brave Americans regarding the murder of our Ambassador and three others by radical, extremist, fundamentalist Islamists are not welcome.
There was no need for their deaths. As the facts indicate, your excuses are disgusting and once again, I will not allow on my thread.
You want to post your trash elsewhere, I can not stop you. But here, I will not allow your hateful comments especially when they are proven lies.
davidlyncr: Pundit: Talk of impeachment is sparse among Dems on the campaign trail
People don't want President Trump Impeached , just a waste of time democrats are doing.
David, the dem's want to waste as much time as possible. The DOJ report is going to decimate them in the public eye. They will try to spin it any way they can.
BREAKING, Whistleblower Lawyer Tries To Stop Trump – Donald D-rops His Presidential Anvil
Nov 11, 2019
HISTORY: Donald Trump Is The First President To Speak at Veterans Day Parade NYC
Nov 11, 2019
Devil, I deleted you because you make no sense whatsoever. It's like you are on a continuous alcohol binge just slamming one down after another.
When you are coherent, you are welcome back. But until then, get your life in order.
davidlyncr: STRONG EVIDENCE “Whistleblower” Linked To Firing of Prosecutor Investigating Hunter Biden
So The New York Times reported that Joe Biden’s own staff thought the Ukrainian gas company Burisma paying Hunter Biden $83,333/month while his father was Vice President was “unseemly” or “worse” — and they made State Department officials help them do damage control.
Joe Biden said he first learned of his son’t activities in Ukraine when the story broke in 2014 according to Hunter Biden’s recollection in a New Yorker piece earlier this year.
The New York Times reports that Joe Biden's own staff thought a Ukrainian gas company paying Hunter Biden $83,333/month while his father was Vice President was "unseemly" or "worse" — and they made State Department officials help them do damage control. pic.twitter.com/imYAuiqsdn
— Trump War Room (Text TRUMP to 88022) (@TrumpWarRoom) November 11, 2019
John Solomon at The Hill also reported on the January 19, 206 meeting between Ukrainian officials and Obama officials at the White House.
The other case raised at the January 2016 meeting, Telizhenko said, involved Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian energy company under investigation in Ukraine for improper foreign transfers of money.
At the time, Burisma allegedly was paying then-Vice President Joe Biden’s son Hunter as both a board member and a consultant. More than $3 million flowed from Ukraine to an American firm tied to Hunter Biden in 2014-15, bank records show.
According to Telizhenko, U.
S. officials told the Ukrainians they would prefer that Kiev drop the Burisma probe and allow the FBI to take it over. The Ukrainians did not agree. But then Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire Ukraine’s chief prosecutor in March 2016, as I previously reported. The Burisma case was transferred to NABU, then shut down.
According to Stephen McIntyre the demand that Ukrainian top prosecutor Viktor Shokin be fired as a condition for IMF loan almost certainly originated with Biden staff. The demand was first announced to Ukrainian prosecutors at a January 19, 2016 meeting with US officials hosted by Eric Ciaramella.
the demand that Shokin be fired as a condition for IMF loan almost certainly originated with Biden staff.
The demand was first announced to Ukr prosecutors at Jan 19, 2016 meeting with US officials hosted by Eric Ciaramella.
— Stephen McIntyre (@ClimateAudit) November 11, 2019
Obviously, this is a very bold and shocking statement.
Sure enough — If you run a search on the White House visitor logs during the final year (2016) of the Obama administration you find that Eric Ciaramella is listed over 200 times. Ciaramella hosted a meeting with Ukrainian diplomat Andrii Telizhenko on January 19, 2016 in the Obama White House.
Fool Nelson first reported this on October 12 before the Ciaramella was alleged publicly to be the whistleblower.
BREAKING: Alleged #Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella ran the meeting that @jsolomonReports was "one of the earliest documented efforts to build the now-debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative". @AndriyUkraineTe please confirm. https://t.co/NOMHAZpXPvhttps://t.co/44Bd4wwmSXpic.twitter.com/2XQyqrYIia
— FOOL NELSON ⭐⭐⭐ (@FOOL_NELSON) October 12, 2019
There may have been a series of meetings held that day with Ukrainian officials in the Obama White House. It is clear that Eric Ciaramella hosted one meeting. It is also clear that this is the day the US told Ukrainian officials in the White House to fire Viktor Shokin.
This is why Eric Ciaramella MUST TESTIFY. He may have filed his phony second-hand “whistleblower” report because he was definitely in on the plot fire the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden.
More evidence emerges that the reason the media want to hide the name of the whistleblower is an honest investigation into Ukraine-Biden corruption would expose the whistleblower's own personal role in criminal conduct.
This is why we don't allow secret accusers in America. https://t.co/O3cobA6B97
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) November 11, 2019
SARA CARTER: Horowitz Report on FISA Abuse Will be Damning, Expected to Contain Several Criminal Referrals
This article was sourced from The Gateway Pundit
DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz is expected to release his much-anticipated FISA abuse report before Thanksgiving and it is expected to contain several criminal referrals, reported investigative journalist Sara Carter.
Horowitz has been working on a report documenting the FISA [Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] abuses by Obama’s corrupt DOJ and FBI during the 2016 election targeting Donald Trump.
“It’s as thick as a telephone book,” Sunday Morning Futures host Maria Bartiromo recently said. “More than just FISA abuse.”
Sara Carter reported:
Horowitz’s investigation on the bureau’s probe into the now debunked theory that Trump colluded with Russia in the 2016 presidential election will more than likely result in the declassification of documents — requested by senior Republican lawmakers for more than several years.
These are the same documents President Trump turned over to Attorney General William Barr in May, giving him ‘full and complete authority” to declassify.
Those documents will contain several classified pages of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page, exculpatory evidence that was withheld from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the so-called ‘Gang of Eight’ folder (which contained exculpatory information), as well as the email chain between FBI investigators in the Russia probe and then-FBI Director James Comey.
Those emails also include discussions with lawyers in the DOJ’s national security division. As previously reported, the email chains will contain information that prove the FBI knew prior to obtaining a warrant to spy on Page that former British spy Christopher Steele’s information in his infamous dossier on Trump could not be proven.
Horowitz’s report is also expected to reveal what TGP has reported on many times — that the FBI knew dossier author Christopher Steele (who was also used by the FBI as a CHS) was leaking to the media, but then used those leaked media reports as ‘evidence’ in their FISA warrant applications — this is known as circular intelligence reporting.
In other words, the FBI used its own leaked false information as ‘evidence’ to justify obtaining FISA warrants on Carter Page rather than independent intelligence gathered from other credible sources.
According to Sara Carter, Horowitz’s report will also contain evidence that the FBI treated Hillary Clinton’s campaign differently than Donald Trump’s camp.
It will confirm reports that Hillary Clinton received a debriefing from the FBI on foreign attempts to infiltrate her camp, something the FBI never offered the Trump camp.
Horowitz last month sent a 2-page letter to Capitol Hill updating lawmakers on his impending report on FISA abuse.
“I anticipate that the final report will be released publicly with few redactions,” Horowitz wrote.
“Given that our draft report is lengthy, and concerns sensitive national security an law enforcement matters, we understood that it would take the Department and the FBI some time to work through and appropriately mark the entire report,” Horowitz wrote.
“I can report to you that the process is ongoing and nearing completion.”
Congressman Nunes in January of 2018 released a 2-page FISA memo revealing Hillary Clinton’s phony dossier formed an essential role in the FBI obtaining the FISA warrants on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.
In fact, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe testified that if not for the phony Russia dossier, the FBI would never have sought the FISA warrants.
The FBI, under Comey’s Directorship, obtained one FISA warrant and three subsequent renewals on Carter Page beginning in October of 2016 and ending in June of 2017.
The FBI also defrauded the FISA judges by withholding exculpatory evidence on Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos.
Michael Horowitz does not have the power to indict anyone, he can only criminally refer people for prosecution.
davidlyncr: Trump Impeachment – Truth v. Biased Hypocrisy
Last week, the Democratic controlled House pushed through rules for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. To no surprise, no House Republicans voted for the impeachment measure and the Independent also voted with the Democrats, but it was a surprise to see that 2 Democrats voted against the measure. However, the vote tally was 232 for the impeachment inquiry with 196 against it.
Naturally, the sewagestream media jumped on the story and reported it with such veracity that one would think that Trump was already proven guilty and ready to be removed from office, but that is far from the truth. Trump has not been found guilty of anything and ultimately, it takes a two-thirds majority vote of the Senate to actually convict Trump of any crime and to determine sentence if found guilty.
Leading up to and after the House impeachment inquiry vote, it became apparent that those pushing for Trump’s impeachment care nothing about legality or whether Trump committed any crime. It is purely a political move to remove the Democrats’ number one enemy. This is evident when you compare the statements made by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA).
Scalise – “When you look at this Soviet-style process, it shows you that they don’t really want to get to the truth. They want to remove a sitting president.”
Those are the truest words I’ve heard spoken during the entire impeachment circus. When you read the words of Schiff, you will understand what Scalise was talking about.
Schiff – “I think they will see facts that cause them great concern about the president abusing the power of his office.” Both quotes transcribed from news broadcasts.
If Schiff, Chair of the House Intelligence Committee, is concerned about a president abusing his power, then why was he silent for the eight years that Barack Hussein Obama repeatedly abused his power, violated the US Constitution, federal laws, Congress and the courts?
To begin with, Schiff is all concerned about Trump’s call with the Ukrainian president, but what about Obama’s visit with former Soviet President Medvedev when Obama was caught on a live microphone telling him that once he is re-elected that he could do anything he wanted?
The US Constitution clearly states that only Congress can alter a law that it is passed, or it can be altered by a ruling of a federal court. However, Obama repeatedly violated this constitutional mandate. When Congress froze assets and the sale of fighter jets to Egypt’s then governing political party, the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama took it upon himself to free up over $50 million and the sale of fighter jets. Don’t forget that the US government defined the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.
What about when Obama instructed the Justice Department to stop enforcing the Defense of Marriage Act, over a year before the Supreme Court ruled against some of the Act’s provisions?
Congress passed the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) which means that only Congress can make alterations to the law, yet on multiple occasions, Obama made changes to some of the provisions and to the effective dates of some of the provisions.
Congress had passed the federal immigration laws, and yet Obama instructed the Department of Homeland Security to not fully enforce all aspects of the law.
Don’t forget that Schiff was one of the loudest complainers about the Russian interference in America’s 2016 election, but it has been proven that Obama and his administration knew about the Russian activities and did nothing to stop it or report it, until AFTER Trump won the election.
Schiff was a loud complainer when Trump tried to block the testimonies of some of his people and yet Obama blocked the testimony of then Attorney General Eric Holder during the congressional investigation of Operation Fast and Furious. Additionally, Obama used his executive privilege to block congressional subpoenas for documents associated with Operation Fast and Furious.
When a federal court ordered the Obama administration to stop issuing the three-year work permits to DACA aliens, his administration continued to issue them for several months afterwards.
Oh yeah, concerning DACA – Obama admitted that it was a temporary thing and when Trump tried to end DACA by the exact same process Obama used to create it, Schiff was one of those claiming that Trump was abusing his power. If that’s the case, then wasn’t Obama also abusing his powers?
Then there is also the illegal sale of 20% of America’s uranium supply to a known enemy – Russia. The Constitution defines this as TREASON.
These are only a few of the many illegalities that took place by Obama and his administration. This proves that Schiff isn’t concerned about a president abusing power, but like Scalise said, it’s all about removing a sitting president.