Sic semper Tyrannis!

junyabee:

Bin Laden was a legacy target of self-admitted guilt, tho' I think he was more an emeritus strategist and symbol at the time of his being taken out near the FRONT YARD of the Pakistani Military Academy! Baghdadi was an on-going threat (as the other-Libs would call Trump an on-going crime...).
My implication was by the rationale you have presented: Trump was more interested in the GREATER benefit (NOT!) it would do for the general safety and welfare of the region and with NO political benefit for him (HA!), the neo-isolationist/no more foreign involvements for the any of the wasteful incidental deaths and casualties
(for his opportunistic and transactionally-minded self). (Taking an attributed quote from Stalin, "One death is a tragedy. [Many] deaths are just a regrettable statistic" applicable for the volunteer-economic-patriots, serving militarist minds and cynical politicians' policies.. Do you really thinks he gives a crap about the Arab-Muslim-Kurdish-Shia civilians who'd be collateral damage going forward??
We can see by the majority Democrat and MSM commentary on the killing that they still with deferring reverence suck the cock of militarist necessity.
Trump and his whisperer, Pompeo, have been seeking ways for the Iranians to do something dramatic and reckless as a reaction to the economic pressure and the military deployments about their country. So this was an inevitable play, but surprising that it was NOT done with BOLTON, earlier. (AND maybe a way to put a non-testifying salve on Bolton's bruised pride.)
This has been the ploy to bolster the cultural rationale that's cathartic to the supporters of the Trump Regime. And it is an example of the contending paradigms of opportunistic impunity confronting conventional formalities of process. Trump. etal., have seen that (to give homage to the banditos of the 'Treasure of the Sierra Madres', ... (continued)

https://www.academia.edu/41521814/Sic_semper_Tyrannis_