Is SITS the God of Wireclub? (Page 4)

oh_good_laughs: pft.. definitely easier to claim no faith, and attack those who are defending theirs. It seems craven, truly.

hellbhoy: If I had a baseball bat SITS I would deffo not give it to you and I'd deffo wouldn't put a paper bag over my head asking for it but nice analogy !.

So back to the thread ! SITS is deffo no GOD because a GOD knows all and SITS just admitted to having to research things he doesn't understand.

LiptonCambell: Do you honestly think its about ease risen?

StuckInTheSixties:

Hellboy says:
"asking for it but nice analogy !"

Who owes who an apology?

You've essentially accused me of lying, and then refused to provide any evidence of that.

More than a little bit of hypocrisy there, hellboy.

StuckInTheSixties:

risen_sun86 says:
"definitely easier to claim no faith, and attack those who are defending theirs. It seems craven, truly."

If someone has beliefs that are faith-based, they need no defense of those beliefs. That is the essence of faith, to believe that which can't be defended factually.

If someone is attempting to defend their beliefs factually, those beliefs, by definition, aren't faith-based.

I have no problem with those that have faith, understand that their beliefs are faith based, and are content in their faith. I have many friends and associates with faith-based beliefs.

My problem comes with those that have faith-based beliefs, yet attempt to portray those beliefs as being based in fact. This is what you characterize as "defending" their beliefs.

oh_good_laughs:

ProfCandyRivers: the vessel with pestle and the chalice from the palace