Most atheists dont know about science (Page 137) kittybobo34: THey built a replica ark in Kentucky not to far from me. THey figured given the amount of time it took to build in man hours with heavy machinery, it would take a small crew of say 10, with manual labor only, about 50 years to build it  Blackshoes: Be reminded that all species have from the begining of creation suffer gentic entropy and following the entropy of the human race only goes back to about 6 to 10 thousand years ago .. http://thetruthwins.com/archives/the-human-race-is-dying-dna-degeneration-would-eventually-lead-to-the-total-extinction-of-humanity kittybobo34: That entropy is random mutations that pile up in a species. Curious about that 6-10 thousand year number. Doesn't seem to be anything special about that time period. Civilizations were starting up all over the world, the Chin, Azteks, Mayans, Egyptians, Kush, Pyramid building was the rage. (Edited by kittybobo34) Blackshoes: Nothing special .. Hmm Unless you believe the eyewitness account of creation Now just what did they say " In the Beginning " (Edited by Blackshoes)  theHating: Blackshoes: Mircoevolution is change in size eye color ete etc ? we see this in real time chronology: No it is not. That is one programme running instead of another. Both were written by God. Blackshoes: I don't understand ? I'll BBL off to work Blackshoes: So condescending ! So typical of all worshippers of whatever evolutionist are preached to by thier academia Gods ! If you only had a clue about how little you understand .. Self imposed blindness of the science and facts 'it's pitiful n' pathetic .. I read your last posted try . It's was like all evolutionary assumptions. Just speculations and opinions of the microbiological world that clearly shows similar patterns . Not common ancestry .Yet: you like most evolutionist have to accept everything you want to hear ! Abiogenesis is Impossible n' Macroevolution is a fairytale ',look beyond your programing ! Remove the concrete between your ears ! Open your mind and read what even evolutionary scientist have say about origins', without all the added rhetoric and assumptions (Edited by Blackshoes)  ghostgeek: We go on and on and on and on about the same things without agreeing on anything. Ignorance, it seems, is eternal. Blackshoes: “If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.” “It is more important to out-think your enemy, than to outfight him” Sun Tzu https://vimeo.com/169805392 (Edited by Blackshoes) kittybobo34: Chimps having a larger genome means nothing other than they are drifting in their own direction just as we are. Blackshoes: It means that it's unimaginable from any genetic mutationally addition to believe they were from a common ancestry of Humans .. Lets mention that the point of the video is that it's not only unlikely it's genetically impossible Every time I try to find hope that Macroevolution maybe at lease plausible ? I keep running into science that states ToE Is not even possible (Edited by Blackshoes) ghostgeek: Once, when people were more evolved, it was known for a certainty that bumble bees couldn't fly. It was impossible. All the experts told us so. Then some sarky bastard found they could fly after all and the world was never the same. ghostgeek: So let us wait until someone figures out what's producing that methane on Mars before saying that life couldn't come into being without a helping hand from a large-domed alien. Blackshoes: What I have noticed within this debate 'which seems be common thread within most of these debates. The Evolutionists are fumbling around ' trying very hard to make believe they have answers for all of the major problematica within their pseudoscience  Notice also the another one of TOEs major assumptions is destroyed and shot down by real science  1:06.4The more I've study real science', the sillier ToE has shown itself to be (Edited by Blackshoes) kittybobo34: Neanderthals do have a genetic connection to humans. Recent DNA comparisons to Europeans, Asians, Africans, and Aborigine show that there was some crossbreeding. Blackshoes: Ok Kitty Which one is telling the truth ? Is there a real connection throught similar DNA comparisons or is it just more evolutionary assumptions ? Please verify your claim ? (Edited by Blackshoes) kittybobo34: YouTube Allot of information there, but about 1/3 of the way through they talk about how they determined the mix of Neanderthal genes in the human genome. Basically it was determined that Aborigine's have the highest mix, with Europeans the next highest, and Africans the least or near zero. Given that there was some cross breeding, that verifies that they share a common ancestry with todays humans (like donkeys are to horses) (Edited by kittybobo34) Blackshoes: Thank you However I was hoping you could give me a science article with reference ? Nova is and has always spun the information towards evolutionary paradigm .. Nova is television program Like all television very little can be verified or believed (Edited by Blackshoes) Blackshoes: No Angry ! A science journal with references ! Nova Like the Discovery channel is nothing more than TV !  Angry Beaver: Kitty: "Basically it was determined that Aborigine's have the highest mix, with Europeans the next highest, and Africans the least or near zero." Mate if you've seen any full blood aborigines, you'd understand that statement | Science Chat Room Similar Conversations |
