Most atheists dont know about science (Page 342)

AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: What if you grow a brain in the meantime?
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
(Post deleted by Blackshoes 3 years ago)
AchillesSinatra
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes:
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

Mark Twain
(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Do you intend to post that in every thread on the Internet?
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: People might mistake you for an idiot with no thoughts of his own.
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: "Coyne has given us one long bluff. Why Evolution Is True tries to defend Darwinian evolution by rearranging the fossil record; by misrepresenting the development of vertebrate embryos; by ignoring evidence for the functionality of allegedly vestigial organs and non-coding DNA, then propping up Darwinism with theological arguments about “bad design;” by attributing some biogeographical patterns to convergence due to the supposedly “well-known” processes of natural selection and speciation; and then exaggerating the evidence for selection and speciation to make it seem as though they could accomplish what Darwinism requires of them.

The actual evidence shows that major features of the fossil record are an embarrassment to Darwinian evolution; that early development in vertebrate embryos is more consistent with separate origins than with common ancestry; that non-coding DNA is fully functional, contrary to neo-Darwinian predictions; and that natural selection can accomplish nothing more than artificial selection—which is to say, minor changes within existing species.

Faced with such evidence, any other scientific theory would probably have been abandoned long ago. Judged by the normal criteria of empirical science, Darwinism is false. Its persists in spite of the evidence, and the eagerness of Darwin and his followers to defend it with theological arguments about creation and design suggests that its persistence has nothing to do with science at all."



https://iconsofevolution.com/why-darwinism-is-false/


"Psychology teaches us that even the most intelligent people frequently reason badly, thus arrive at beliefs that are hopelessly irrational."

Achilles Sintra




(Edited by Blackshoes)
3 years ago Report
0
Blackshoes
Blackshoes: "Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species." (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)
"I reject evolution because I deem it obsolete; because the knowledge, hard won since 1830, of anatomy, histology, cytology, and embryology, cannot be made to accord with its basic idea. The foundationless, fantastic edifice of the evolution doctrine would long ago have met with its long- deserved fate were it not that the love of fairy tales is so deep-rooted in the hearts of man." (Dr. Albert Fleischmann, University of Erlangen)
"By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them." (Luther Sunderland, "Darwin's Enigma", p.10)
"The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion... The only alternative is the doctrine of special creation, which may be true, but is irrational." (Dr. L.T. More)
"I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme... (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, "incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived."
"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory -- is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation..." (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin's "Origin of Species"
"What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events... An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle... (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)
"Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE... It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God." (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of "Evolution from Space," after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)
"The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein... I am at a loss to understand biologists' widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious." (Sir Fred Hoyle)
"I don't know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The 'others' are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles... It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics." (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These "mathematical miracles" that must have occurred are summarized in my paper "The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution"

"The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change..." (Dr. Stephen Jay Gould, famous Harvard Professor of Paleontology)
"I admit that an awful lot of that has gotten into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance, the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs (in the American Museum) is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that that is lamentable, particularly because the people who propose these kinds of stories themselves may be aware of the speculative nature of some of the stuff. But by the time it filters down to the textbooks, we've got science as truth and we've got a problem." (Dr. Niles Eldridge, Curator of Invertebrate Paleontology at the American Museum)
"The fundamental reason why a lot of paleontologists don't care much for gradualism is because the fossil record doesn't show gradual change and every paleontologist has know that ever since Cuvier. If you want to get around that you have to invoke the imperfection of the fossil record. Every paleontologist knows that most species, most species, don't change. That's bothersome if you are trained to believe that evolution ought to be gradual. In fact it virtually precludes your studying the very process you went into the school to study. Again, because you don't see it, that brings terrible distress." (Dr. Stephen Jay Gould)
"To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest." (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)
"Evolution is a theory universally accepted, not because it can be proved to be true, but because the only alternative, 'special creation,' is clearly impossible." (D.M.S. Watson, Professor of Zoology, London University)
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: Must you post the same damn thing in every thread???

Annoying git
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Yes, Blackshoes, I just woke up and every thread I've checked is full of your copy-pasta bullshit.

This is known as spamming.

A lot of idiots do it.
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: *reports*
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: You can get 24 hours for that.

I'll let you off with a stern warning if you'd just think for yourself.

By that, I don't mean "Evolution is crap!! Squawk!!"

Any idiot could say that.
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: And they do!
3 years ago Report
1
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: It would also help if you broke your mind-numbing copy-pasta bullshit into convenient paragraphs.
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: How's the sheila, mate?
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: "paragraphs"... what are they? lol
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: Things r grim in the sheila dept lol
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Here's an example:

"Evolution is crap!!! Squawk!!"
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Aww, same here. My Pilipina is mad at me.
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: Bloody wimmen!
3 years ago Report
1
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Wanna have a few Tooheys and Skype?
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: LOL.

Times like these Cteationist halfwits don't seem so bad,
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: Already had several cleansing ales, skyoe sounds good... half hr or so?
3 years ago Report
0
MJ59
MJ59: Need to buy a few more lol
3 years ago Report
0
AchillesSinatra
AchillesSinatra: Yes ok. Make yourself presentable.

You looked like the New York skyline last time. (post 9/11)
3 years ago Report
0