What is this "science" of which you speak? (Page 2)

StuckInTheSixties: I'm trying to set an example for you.

MrSteveA67: Yes, I'm slow, but noticed, thank you SITS.

*bows deeply*

Dalai Mama: Wow....it took a bit to get through....but rather than get caught up in the "color black" really just being the absence of any light in the spectra....and...well everything else...what is science to me?

Absolutely wonderful and in everything...science is discovery....science is passion

Without Science the world would be a dismal place indeed...

MrSteveA67: That's how it's suppose to be done, Mojo

Fruitless born a thousand times
lies barren.

Unguided inspiration yields random motion
driven circumscribed in destination
going nowhere

Guidance uninspired always true in facing
stands immobile

But fixed upon that destination firmly
and with inspiration lofted
beget your dreams

daydreams: we need sciences to learn more and to move ahead as human beings , pure as simply complex as may be.

Dalai Mama: rofl @ SITS

StuckInTheSixties: (laughs along with Mojo)

XFixYourBrainX: Science uses current knowledge to provide answers for what is possible.

StuckInTheSixties: Umm ... somethin' like that.

XFixYourBrainX: Geoff says, "science is nothing more than a process of testing"

Scientists control the testing and its results. So let the scientists test, and let the rest of the world test their results.

Karma: What?

StuckInTheSixties: Hey, that makes sense. If people without the expertise, training, technical equipment, experience, etc. that the scientific community has questions what those scientists conclude, we should give that equal consideration.

Those scientists think they're so f@*y~*' smart. Who needs 'em? **












** sarcasm

XFixYourBrainX: You assume that anyone who doesn't involve themselves in science has no intelligence towards expertise, training, technical equipment, experience, etc besides scientists themselves? Hahahahahaha that's the funniest damn thing I ever heard.

Karma: What? Really? Have you ever listened to Abbott and Costello's Who's On First?

Geoff: Science is all about openness, anyone can request any scientific paper from the publishing body and examine the methods and conclusions.

So, if you want to re-examine any scientific research, you already can.

So stop b%$&*y*@ about science being a conspiracy.

XFixYourBrainX: Geoff says, "So stop b^&y#*z& about science being a conspiracy."

Who said it was a conspiracy?

WilliamGolding: But didn't you guys know, everything is a conspiracy! hahaha! Even laughing!

XFixYourBrainX: Geoff assumes in an ignorant way, haha if that's possible.

StuckInTheSixties: (laughs hysterically)

Geoff: "Scientists control the testing and its results. So let the scientists test, and let the rest of the world test their results."

If that isn't an accusation of a conspiracy, I don't know what is.

Geoff: No response?

oh_good_laughs: Science is observing, is testing, is building. Nothing wrong with science.. true science.

LiptonCambell: Lmao and what is "true science"? Can you provide an example of "Untrue Science"?

It sounds like you just wanna have the freedom to denounce any sciencific conclusions are wrong because it doesn't follow your own personal convictions(aka "true science"

oh_good_laughs: Lipton, of any conversation, of any topic, it seems you always have to be dragged along. Pfft, take a bus.

StuckInTheSixties: Risen's "true science" includes things like "new geology," which he cites when arguing things like Noah's Ark, etc.

Risen, you wouldn't know true science if it shit on your shoe.