Fascinating New Insights about Mars

DawnGurl: Just thought Id share this video with fellow Mars enthusiasts:

duncan124:
Have you actually watched it yourself ;--and if so can you tell us the main interesting points??

DawnGurl: The most fascinating aspect of this video is the process of layering revealed in photos which strongly suggests a very active surface geologically and also evidence that much erosion was caused by water. The video has innumerable interesting goodies in it and is well worth the effort to watch it thoroughly.

lori100: The face on Mars is interesting, and the ruined city monuments in the exact pleiadian star formation tell the real story.....

duncan124:
NASA had pictures of the polar caps and it was clear that they were covered in snow.

ghostgeek: Sad to say but there's no face on Mars. It's just a natural rock formation.

http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast24may_1/

lori100: That's what they want the public to believe.....Nasa often lies....

ghostgeek: No Lori, they just sent better cameras up there.

lori100: The NASA Conspiracies: The Truth Behind the Moon Landings, Censored Photos , and The Face on Mars [Paperback]
by Nick Redfern -------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------Dark Mission: The Secret History of NASA

by Richard C. Hoagland --------------------------Mystical organizations quietly dominate NASA, carrying out their own secret agendas behind the scenes. This is the story of men at the very fringes of rational thought and conventional wisdom, operating at the highest levels of our country. Their policies are far more aligned with ancient religions and secret mystery schools than the facade of rational science NASA has successfully promoted to the world for almost fifty years.

Dark Mission is proof of the secret history of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the astonishing, seminal discoveries it has repeatedly suppressed for decades.

ghostgeek: Nothing suppressed. Otherwise nobody would have heard about "The Face on Mars."

lori100: Hoagland^^^^ was one who published the pics in a book....not Nasa.... and most people don't pay much attention to Nasa....

ghostgeek: Better camera, better images, no face.

duncan124:
Its the ' Conspiracy Theorists ' and ' followers of authority ' who stop the other scientific researchers from saying what they know.

NASA is clearly a mouth peace for the US military and made ridiculous speeches to encourage the ' Conspiracy Theorists ' and ' followers of authority '.

LiptonCambell: Wait wait wait....

So NASA took pictures of mars.....found a shape that looks alot like a face....then they sent better cameras up there, pointed them at the same point, and found nothing...

And they're liars?

If they're constantly liars, Lori, then how can you be certain they weren't lying about the first image, rather than the second? maybe they're lying about both images, and just used photoshop?

I just find it funny that you insist they're liars about everything, but can't live in a world where they lied about one of the two images.....I mean, both images came from NASA- shouldn't we assume then both images are bullshit created by NASA? How do you not know that the face image wasn't put there to control you?

LiptonCambell: If NASA was covering up the face on mars, why would they publish it in the first place? They took the freakin picture, after all...

lori100: I don't think NASA lies about everything...but probably a lot....they did not publish the original pics....lots of people monitor the NASA sites before they remove or change images...

ghostgeek: Why would NASA put a picture on its site if it didn't want people to see it?

lori100: Some might have odd features...like the face....that they didn't think people would notice...

ghostgeek: You make it sound like the people at NASA are pretty dumb. Makes one wonder how they ever took the picture in the first place.

duncan124:
" Wait wait wait...."???


Didn't he also say 'This is the Science thread!!!"

You don't have to be a psychologists to spot that he can't understand that seeing a small dot that looked like a face is as real as a Scientist looking at a small dot and saying it means this.

His penile fear of being ridiculous makes everything he does vile.

lori100: ...."penile fear"........

duncan124:
It's certainly no laughing matter! LOL

duncan124:
A more constructive argument might be;

If Aliens had visited Earth would n't they also want to visit Mars? Is there any evidence of the Aliens visiting Mars as well?

The same Aliens would leave the same clues on both planets?

The face has disappeared and its started snowing again! Where else has snow hidden an alien base...?

LiptonCambell: Actually, if you are legitimately interested in this topic, then aliens shouldn't be in here at all.

The threads topic is interested discoveries made by NASA- not whining about how NASA lies about the alien agenda, or how you hold a religious zeal over the validity their images, and your personal interpretation of the images, while still insisting that other images hold no validity equally because of your personal interpretation.

It really is stupid, Lori....why do you think NASA let it be released, if that's legitimately a face, and their goal is to keep it underwraps?

lori100: Nasa wasn't aware (likely) that people would notice it....it was in 1976....before internet and more people are paying attention to Nasa images...

lori100: This video shows the monuments on Mars in exact star formations....same as pyramids in star formations.... whoever built both knew about the stars....-------------