Evolution is racist!!!!! (Page 8) (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff ) (Post deleted by staff )  Alex1963: Evolution and natural selection is about there being diversity within the species so that the species can adapt and survive in a changing environment. There is diversity within the human species and that includes in skin pigmentation which may be or may not be an advantage depending on the environment. (Edited by Alex1963)  kittybobo34: Or are the Nitwits the ones that don't follow the science. The holy rollers, and evangelists that have their own agenda. Those are the Nitwits.  kittybobo34: I disagree, the basis is very sound. based on quite a few sciences, all independently arriving at the same conclusion. Fossils, dating, geology, genetics. all verify the conclusions. to ignore that is ignore the obvious. zeffur: re: "kittybobo34: I disagree, the basis is very sound. based on quite a few sciences, all independently arriving at the same conclusion." Yet you have no proof of any original microbe, no common ancestor of mankind, & no real evidence of any transitional fossils. Which of course proves that you don't have any real science---just biased & bogus beliefs. Drinking the same Koolaid & promoting the same lie doesn't make it true--it makes it pathetic that we live in such a corrupt society... (Edited by zeffur) kittybobo34: Original microbe? they don't leave fossils..... Common ancestors? How many of austrolopithicus do we need to find, we are up to 17 now, lost count of Neanderthals. All those are transitionals. zeffur: Extinct chimps don't = mankind--no matter how you try to conflate the two. Failed attempts of Evolutioners: 1. Natural selection fails because there are no real transitional fossils, thousands of years of selective breeding has never shown any sign of a transition from one kind of creature to another, & exhaustive fruitfly trails have proven genetic stasis prevents any kind of evolution. Breeding reduces the complexity of a genome--it does not increase the complexity of a genome as would be necessary to go from a microbe to a mouse or to a human over time--there is ZERO real evidence that such a thing has ever occurred. 2. Adaptation fails because there is no evidence that extreme conditions or toxity can produce any new genetic code to improve any creature. All survivors already had the genetic mojo to survive--when the conditions get beyond that limit the creature dies & the kind becomes extinct--they do not evolve wings & fly away to safety... 3. Mutations fail because 80+% of mutations cause deleterious (deformities, sterility, etc) results or death. Science has not & cannot prove or confirm any other mutations have led to kind level evolution of any kind. What we actually see are just minor variations in genetic expression within kinds--there is NO sound basis that kind-level evolution has EVER occurred. Hence, there is NO sound basis whatsoever for the myth & fairy tale biased & bogus beliefs of evolution. It's been a lie & fraud from the beginning... (Edited by zeffur) kittybobo34: Odd they would find extinct chimps with human teeth, neck joints, hands, and hip joints, but you are the expert arent you kittybobo34: True, but they do not have our eyes,, beside we are talking bones, and teeth, the fingerprints of a species. zeffur: It doesn't matter that chimps & humans have similar features--so do many birds--that doesn't mean they are descendants of each other--it just means they were designed & made from similar genetic palettes. Evolution has NOT & can NOT prove otherwise. kittybobo34: Chimps and humans do not have similar joints in those areas, not teeth especially. (Edited by kittybobo34) zeffur: The fact is that chimps have very similar teeth to humans--with the exception of longer cuspid teeth in chimps beyond a certain age. At different developmental stages it's very easy to conflate human & chimp teeth--which doesn't matter in the slightest. Comparative anatomy is not a reliable tool for assessing evolution because we know it is possible for a wide range of physical variations within a single species (e.g. dogs have a huge range of bone structures--yet they are all the same species. It is plainly obvious that one cannot & should not use comparative anatomy as a tool to try to prove or make a case for evolution because it can never be reliable. That's why evolutioners try to use it--because they know it is a powerful tool to try to deceive people to believe their biased & bogus lies to dupe some people to believe in evolution that has never been proven to have EVER occurred. If you compare extinct chimp with those of modern chimps, you will see that all of the variations within their kind are found in both ages of bones. Furthermore, you will see that humans have many times more bones than all of those chimps--past & present--that is an undeniable fact. Nothing evolution has presented is valid or true--it's nothing but a baised & bogus congame for atheists & other nitwits. (Edited by zeffur) kittybobo34: Right Zeff,, ignore the experts, the people that study the anatomy of species, that way you are always right' (Post deleted by staff ) zeffur: re: "kittybobo34: Right Zeff,, ignore the experts, the people that study the anatomy of species, that way you are always right'" Authority/expert fallacy doesn't equal truth... Bad try. You either have proof or compelling/convincing incontrovertible evidence & a cogent explanation to verify/confirm your beliefs are true or you don't---and you don't have ANYTHING that isn't anything more than just biased & bogus misinterpretation & misrepresentations of the available evidence. (Edited by zeffur) kittybobo34: Nor do amateurs invested in their religion = truth... even worse try I will stick with the science on this, they have more than enough proof. zeffur: re: "kittybobo34: Nor do amateurs invested in their religion = truth... even worse try. I will stick with the science on this, they have more than enough proof. " Actually, they offer NO proof whatsoever. To believe such a lie is to delude yourself. We aren't typing about anything at this moment other than the biased & bogus myth of evolution. Since evolution offers NO sound basis for it's beliefs whatsoever, there is no reason anyone should accept it as valid/true. There are alternatives to evolution. Whether or not they can be proven scientifically does not mean they are untrue--it just means they cannot be proven to be valid/true. Evolution on the other hand is a straight up lie/fraud from day one! (Edited by zeffur) MJ59: Please provide proof that Darwin's work ever said man was descended from apes..... This should be interesting.... | Science Chat Room 1 Person Chatting Similar Conversations |
