Are Religious people Stupid? (Page 3) JX Amaro: LOL. I’ll let readers decide if an “on-line” survey of 63,000 people is scientific or a laughably typical example of pseudo-scholars merely finding the conclusions they went fishing for. Too easy. The facts are plain. You (TiU) thought religious people are stupid (see the title of YOUR thread). No true. Your thread has been destroyed and you are exposed as a pig-headed, anti-intellectual laughingstock! LOL! ROFL! (If TiU was intellectually honest, he would admit that the thread was set up as a joke that backfired. He would admit that there are smart and stupid people to be found in all types of worldviews. He would concede defeat in a gentlemanly way and move on to the next debate. But he doesn’t. He doubles down on his now destroyed thesis and tries – like a small child! – to pretend like he won. LMAO! Like I said, scratch an Atheist and find a petty and petulant little dictator. Too true.) Thanks for giving me some laughs!!!  TheismIsUntenable: Well it's published by scientists in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so...seems pretty obvious that it's scientific. By the way, it's not "on-line", it's "online". It seems that not only are you stupid but uneducated as well. If you're laughing at your own stupidity, that's great. We are all laughing at you as well. JX Amaro: Um, I engage in lots of orthographic oddities! It's one of my curious eccentricities!!! I'll let the readers decide if I am "uneducated." But I think you are unwise to engage in so much OBVIOUS intellectual dishonesty. Very telling. Live in NeverNeverLand if you like. No problem. JX Amaro: @MJ59: I bet you have missed a whole lot in Life. No problems. I'm just chillin' on a day off. TheismIsUntenable: Funny how I'm charged with dishonesty after I debunk something my opponents say... "How dare you! GRR, you must be lying. I'm sure I'm right !1!1!101!!!!" Nope, you're wrong as are most people who oppose me. JX Amaro: Oh, the laughs never end. Let me quote just ONE telling line from TheismisUntenable’s “on-line” (or “online” if one wants to be a dull, march-in-lockstep conformist about things) study. “Edit: A previous version of the summary by Victoria D. had numerous errors.” LMAO!!! Yes, go read the “study” for yourself: the jokes write themselves. Gosh, I guess the “scientists” here can’t even get their own damn story straight!!! Too funny! It goes on with a panicky phobia that by 2050 the non-religious crowd might be reduced to a mere 13% of the global population – with world-catastrophe (no doubt) to follow. Apocalyptic Atheism, oh my! Thankfully our own Colonel Kurtz (TiU) has arrived to save the day. Religious stooges? Kill ‘em all! It ends by hiding behind “weenie” phrases like: “these findings provide evidence in support of the hypothesis...”; and, “If, as this work suggests...” Ughhh. Like I said before, this is “junk science.” These are trashy junk academics with their own agenda merely fishing for pseudo-scientific “findings” that support their preordained group-think bias. This is OBVIOUS. Game Over. (Note: TIU, in a stunning display of ignorance, even claims this “study” has the “imprimatur” (shall we say) of “peer review.” If TIU had any familiarity with contemporary academia, he would KNOW that “peer review” is just the academic CENSOR that – like “publish or perish” – keeps academics in line with the dogmas of their corporate sponsors/masters… Though it is off topic, I can’t help but point out that Corporate Power favors Atheism for fear of the “Social Justice” aspects of religion. Corporate Power operates on what Adam Smith called, The Vile Maxim of the Masters of Mankind: “All for us, none for them.” Christianity, and Religion in general, has always stood – however imperfectly – with the weak and wretched of the world against Power. Demented Atheists might want to reflect on this. With Atheism, there is no Christian “Law of Love,” only Nature’s “Law of the Jungle.”) TheismIsUntenable: @Jx "A previous version of the summary by Victoria D. had numerous errors.” LMAO!!! Yes, go read the “study” for yourself: the jokes write themselves. Gosh, I guess the “scientists” here can’t even get their own damn story straight!!! Too funny!" The "summary" referenced here is the article written about the study, not the study itself... Facepalm, you're a clown. JX Amaro: @Thelonious: You mean when I go into "Attack Tiger" mode? IDK. Maybe too much caffeine. LOL  stirrersays: We are all alive because our parents had sex, It's no big mystery or a difficult question, Have a good day, stirrersays: We are all born from the earth then will die and become part of it again, no space travel necessary, I'm sorry there is no heaven, it sounds like a great escape with wonderful outcomes though, It sucks its not real though, AStudent: Wait a minute.....creationism and Biblical literalism are false dilemmas Are you going to argue they aren't ? | Science Chat Room 2 People Chatting Similar Conversations |
