 |          northern35: hi sorry 3 years ago • Report 1  JoelBklyn: Robert, today's non-scientific facts are considered "objective" if they're formulated by our government leaders, in order to convince themselves (and us) they live in a relative world, where objective facts can be stretched to the point where they conform to the non-objective whims and wishes of these self-aggrandizing "shape-shifters".. The fact that their intention is to distort our sense of reality -- and thus prevent us from knowing the truth -- should be cause for little alarm. On that basis alone, we MUST believe, for example, that Joe Biden never once spoke to his son Hunter Biden about the latter's questionable business dealings in China and Ukraine. So long as Biden ASSERTED he did not, that should be "scientific proof" enough to satisfy even the most skeptical among us.  djo2027: Unfortunately Joel, There was a man that came forward and worked with Hunter and Met with Joe Biden that says differently, That in fact should be considered PROOF that Hunter and Joe Both are lying. The man that came forward was the person that quit because he felt their business dealings were unsavory. |
