Enki Iesous Offline

Paleolithic Period to Sumerian

I have heard through the grapevine, that there have been digs where archaeologists have uncovered giant bone structures of people (i.e. Giant Humans). I am not much of a conspiracy theorist, however some things to consider when people talk about Giant Humanoid structures and reference to Biblical mythologies especially the term 'Nephilim'.
According to Strong's Concordance the term are Nephilim: "giants," name of two peoples, one before the flood and one after the flood http://biblehub.com/hebrew/5303.htm and originates from the word "naphal" naphal: to fall, lie, but of course Hebrew as I know is a defunct Canaanite language and develops through the Phoenician. Essentially, my assertion is that the Israelite's were Canaanite in origin. So it is possible the polytheistic Canaanites knew of these legends or alternatively that there was a flood but it wasn't a major flood as the epic of Noah adopts from Atrahasis in Babylon and earlier Ziusudra.
So, when these huge bones are found I don't think it is accurate to reference Biblical literature. As in the Epic of Noah, all the Giants on the earth are swept away. Yet we see Giants after the Epic of Noah such as King Og, Goliath, The great warriors in Ezekiel 32:27, and in Numbers 13:33, also in Native American culture's Giants are referenced.
To add to this, in relation to archaeology when you look at linguistics, I provided http://www.ancientscripts.com/ws_timeline.html as reference for the development of languages, yet I thank Jonah Mason for providing the information on the cultures that Kastoria predates the Sumerian language http://greece.greekreporter.com/2012/07/16/7270-year-old-tablet-found-in-kastoria-calls-into-question-history-of-writing/ and this period being the Neolithic period.
However, something to keep in mind that the Neolithic period may begin about 10,000 BC and end about 5,000 BC. So during this period it might be safe to say the Vinča culture existed, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinča_culture (I generally am not a fan of Wikipedia, but for some references it is easy) I myself would not consider these "civilizations" but scattered groups of people, which I am thoroughly interested in their religious views. I tend to see these groups as Proto Sumerian and I am not sure how far back they predate. Even, the Ubaid and builders of Gobekli Tepe I would consider Proto Sumerian, for example the poem of the "debate between the sheep and the grain" might allude to Sumerian's who built Gobekli Tepe.
The problem is that drawings on caves or pictography is hard to place together to make an assumption about what a certain set of people did culturally or believed religiously. Hence, comparing drawings from the Paleolithic era to drawings in Sumer, might be much like comparing Ziusudra to Noah in the Bible, so much time has passed and so many translations, have gone by.
Another example, I am not sure whether some of the cave drawings such as in "Cave of the Castle" in Spain might be religious drawings as it seems oxen or cows are depicted and much later on in Babylon they are worshiped; part of the worship is that they are sacrificed and eaten as the bovine becomes part of the Babylonian worshiper. As the cave drawings could be Paleolithic Period drawings, and it might be hard to piece together those Humanoids, their beliefs, cultural and hierarchal operations just based on rock findings and cave drawings. "Cave of the Castle" in Spain could also be Paleolithic period, meaning that we would have no idea of what those languages would mean from Paleolithic period until the end of Neolithic period. Even in Sumer the language is difficult to understand Cuneiform.
Pictograph is hard to decipher same with making a connection between Giant Bones and Biblical Mythologies. But also I would assert that culture adopts from other cultures, we even see some trends now from the 1980's sort of making an appearance in the upper 2000's period with the Hipster culture and Millennial’s.
Also, comparing any large founded bones does not conclude a Biblical or a conspiracy theory is correct. In fact it does the opposite as mythologies (which a mythology might not happen unless an actual event happened unrelated or semi related to the mythology at hand) have to be scrutinized, and researched.
But, how do we know the statues and drawings mean? Here is an example from https://www.britannica.com/event/Paleolithic-Period a "Venus" figure is show female sexuality and fertility, but do we know if the statue is a a Goddess? Or is it a fertility statue to protect pregnant women and bring on a healthy childbirth? In Sumer Inanna (Female God) is the provider of love, beauty, sex, desire, fertility, war, combat, justice, and political power.
A bone flute is shown, however, in order to play music one might need musical notation. If this existed, or found, then it is possible that Neolithic languages can be surely understood or found and deciphered.