DIES IRAE-'Days of Wrath'

More Elemental than specie progenitors of our nature
‘Dies Irae’ (Days of Wrath)

After doing the latest explanation of the coincidental association of the chaotic historical events that have occurred on my birthday, August 24th, and my behavior, as described by my high school physics teacher, '..., Wherever you are chaos reigns!'. I came to this self-realization.

At the time I was flattered-to-amusement by that descriptive pejorative of myself. As I noted above in my repeated incidental explanations, which reviewed my prior days and years, it did reveal how my presence was seen by the various provincial, power-that-be of whatever status quo as a disruptive presence to the paradigms of their emotional order.

DIES IRAE-'Days of Wrath
https://www.academia.edu/116577256/DIES_IRAE_Days_of_Wrath

Entropy of Cultural Intangibles

Entropy of Cultural Intangibles : Frogs in simmering hotter water


What the smugly apathetic don't realize until it's retrospective is that the degradation and degeneration of the pillars of their practical world come AFTER the intangibles of their existence decay from their inherent flaws and vulnerabilities that were the fractures of inconsistencies all along.


The myth of platitudes, formerly the cornerstone of civil ethics and behavior, become the anachronistic and mocked standards by those whose more practical, invested imperatives won't suffer the artificial and hollow symbolism for the sake of those out-moded platitudes.


When 'the rule' no longer rules, then the operatives and functionaries see their authority slipping away with the increased indirect asymmetric challenges as well as the more frequent anomalous direct challenges to their authority and status.

That's all in the visual, but subconscious background that is insidiously becoming part of the interactive foreground, that wasn't expected-let alone anticipated. Just as the 'frog is cooked', so is the architecture, both tangible and intangible, that was the self-identifying distinguishing points of what was your existence.

Full OP-link [ https://shorturl.at/fFMO0 }

GRACES of Mystical Metaphysical Phenomenology

GRACES of Mystical Metaphysical Phenomenology (Being a conduit of an aesthetic visitation) Beyond suggesting that Mystical-Metaphysical-Phenomenology is transcendent to the paradigms of reductionist or objectivist circumspection, IT is the dimensional domain beyond our temporal physical and psychological states. It's the fortuitous meaning of an intervening force and energy, gratuitously given as a beneficial option. In being so, it's the liberating emancipator for the particular ad hoc needs in the moment. What I've been pondering is 'Does this 'state of grace' result from a conscious condition or a set of objective circumstances requiring a favorable receptiveness-of-morale for the recipient. I've had several over my 73-plus years, and am able to say that objective 'virtue' or 'righteousness', as it's conventionally conceived, IS NOT the prime factor for its advent. Yet, short of some para-normal, supra-carnal source of mentoring favoritism, or a pre-incaranted anointed purpose: the reason for being the beneficiary of such a fortuitous grace comes without a clearly acceptable explanation. That's why this inquiry into the substance of what I know as the phenomenological mystical metaphysics is happening. I do think that it's its own dimension that can intersect as a tangent to our temporal awareness, even if its parallel existence, as far as form and purpose is inscrutable. Declaring the beneficial effects of its intervention, does not mutually exclude an amoral aspect of its basic nature. Is my particular experience one that solely exists with this phenomena or am I one of many unique interactions with this energy-force? I can testify that others have indirectly benefited from the advent of this visitation by way of me, as a conduit vector. There existed an altruistic good will between me and those other persons. What still remains unexplained beyond reductionist 'random luck' denotings, is why and how I became that graced. Was it by some unconscious or subconscious attribute? One parallel I found that's similar to my experience is in the scriptures of Genesis 18: 1-33. In particular the verses, Genesis 18:10-14 King James Version: Verse 10 And he said, I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him. 11 Now Abraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women. 12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also? 13 And the Lord said unto Abraham, Wherefore did Sarah laugh, saying, Shall I of a surety bear a child, which am old? 14 Is any thing too hard for the Lord? At the time appointed I will return unto thee, according to the time of life, and Sarah shall have a son. This fantasyful appearance and fulfillment of the given oath to Abraham and Sarah, was due to Abraham's receptiveness to the stranger's appearance and subsequent words, and the precipitated those events-from the inference I took from that passage. Similarly, I encountered ideas for which I gave credibility from the logic of the idea and the manner that the idea came to my awareness, phenomenologically. Most of those ideas and thoughts were archived in my memory as 'keepers-for future use'. The additions over the years created an aggregation, which when casually reviewed by me, formed an aesthetic of attitude. That aesthetic attitude could have been configured by a neurological metaphysics as a default antenna that could receive certain signal frequencies. Those frequencies, if found favorable and useful to my present or projected future, were added to the architectural construction of the default antenna. In that way my neurological 'SETI Telescope [The Allen Telescope Array (ATA) is the first radio telescope to be designed from the ground up to be used for SETI searches.Until its construction, all radio SETI efforts were dependent on the intermittent use of antennas built for conventional astronomical observations.]' became a conduit for evermore particularized and focused signals-of-anomalous-use. In this way I became an involuntary enabler of the transmitted projections with which I had strong visceral resonance. That resonance radiated out. They most strongly projected and manifested when my emotional investment was abnormally high in resonance with the projections. Since this occurred incrementally over decades of my life, the micro-choices I made were influenced subtly and then more consciously as the aesthetic came to be the primary determinant of my rationalization of thought for actions. The incidental distinguishment from my social contemporaries, at first, and my contemporaries' cultural emotional web created a more tenuous connection and position I had with my contemporaries and former peers. As a temporal being, this was an issue of adaptation and accommodation, that now has resolved as a transactional strategy and tactics of social interaction. Social interactions are more the mechanics of incidental, pedestrian navigation and, lesser-so, a promotion or 'branding' of my identity. My 'identity' is the relationship I've developed with the mystical-metaphysics phenomena. [Case study scholars examine a particular phenomenon, while phenomenological scholars examine its essence and meaning as experienced by people in their everyday lives.]. Meaning, that the events through my refracted, subjectively defined aesthetics are the determining factor. It's private and, generally, anonymous to practically all contemporaries. By seeing my existence as a discipline of a practiced dialectics of those accumulating prime aesthetics, I hope to have a highly acute focus that's purged of the non-aesthetic social culture of incidental pedestrain existence. The 'prime aesthetics', so focused upon, will be visitations, ala Genesis 18, that will supplement my receptiveness. The ad hoc functional resonations being the organic incarnated serendipities of union with the knowledge of the 'eternal cosmic energies', I will be both the catalyst and the precipitation portal of fortuities, here-on-earth as ordained by the 'cosmic eternal order, aka [CEO]'. ------------------------------ At best, a meta-viral spreading of that attitudinal juxtaposition with the 'CEO' will develop a critical mass of social resonation in the temporal, pedestrian consciousness. The derived emotional union amongst those of the critical mass will be a matrix force-field that generates the (hopefully beneficial) attributes in the same synchronistic fortuity that I've been subject to and the witness of, but on a much grander macro-scale. ------------- Will these manifestations bend-the-arc of history and justice to a more favorable position. I can give this Neo-testament that if the fortuitous synchronicities occur to the many on the macro-stage as happened to me on the micro-stage, then Mao's 'Let many flowers bloom' will be the pastures in which Fate will maketh us to lie down in green pastures: [and It] leadeth us beside the still waters: restoring our souls. ================= YouTube companion:

Political Revolts as equivalent to modern day "Slave Revolts"

Political Revolts as equivalent to modern day "Slave Revolts"

YouTube companion video:

The awakening and departure from 'the norms' and from the witting or conditioned tools of the moment. (pic-a) As Karl Marx said, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce". (pic-a1)

What Harriet Tubman HAD TO engineer to achieve hers and others freedom, (pic-a2) others are in a passive to aggressive reaction are distancing, being disaffected, and estranged from the past social expectations to seize -at the least- their piece of self-determination from a cultural way of life that is a psychological, if not a pecuniary, repression upon them.(pic-b2)

The farce of the present is all those who still celebrate life on the cultural plantation as one that's meaningful to them. (pic-c). That celebration makes those who revolt depicted as deranged actors. (pic-d), rather than being depicted as those in the U.S., who are the liberating and liberated, freed women and men that they are (pic-e)

FOR THOSE WHO DON'T SEE THE 'ANOINTED ONES'...

FOR THOSE WHO DON'T SEE THE 'ANOINTED ONES',BIDEN/TRUMP, AS THE TEMPORAL-OR-DIVINE SAVIOR OF DEMOCRACY-OR-NATION, RESPECTIVELY

As the mobsters in Godfather-I sitting around the table as they commiserated the over the devolved state of the mob peace after the attempted assassination of Vito, ambush of Sonny with Michael's assassination of the police captain: here we are in 2024 in a similar state of the inevitable probability of micro-intents creating the macro-circumstances.

https://s2.glbimg.com/t0gH1G-jFf3tiZA_Mq3_tfGFWU_WJq5j29lu-PbNK9tIoz-HdGixxa_8qOZvMp3w/e.glbimg.com/og/ed/f/original/2013/10/31/godfather.jpg

What the 'Greatest Generation-(1910-1930)' accomplished and experienced despite their own PTSD trauma of post-WWI, the Great Depression, WW-II-Korea, yet they passed on their resilient legacy to We-Boomers. That legacy was not fully appreciated. For many it was an abstract didactic, than a visceral, ground-zero reality. Because of that, the lessons-learned were distorted to their provincial legends and myths narratives that were amplified and disseminated by a mass media news and entertainment full of the hubris of their means to emotionally manipulate.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/V-J%20Day%20celebrations-in%20Jackson%20Square%2C%20Oak%20Ridge%202%20-%20wikimedia%20-%20Kristen%20D.%20Burton.jpg;

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTELIh9xShO_cT1XEr267O1ZzCboXmJtKFbA4dabgnh-jEBA6qVhnYs9X5clKHTgwzdToI&usqp=CAU;

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51UD3ZkyBHL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg;


Just as there's denial today about the influence of entertainment offline-and-online games and media that enables and encourages a narrative of credibility for fictionalized distortions of reality. Now We have life-imitating-the fiction. Some say we'd have created God, anyway from the necessity of absolute qualities He's attributed to possess. Mary Shelley echoed that with the Frankenstein narrative. That impulse to fill the void of our limitations to our realities continued with the philosophies of the 19th centuries turned into the wars and ideologies of the 20th Century, and now the outright dissembling fictions-as-conspiracies, today.

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/819VjJ8ainL._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg;

https://hips.hearstapps.com/hmg-prod/images/gridoffset-videogames-1-1585583517.jpg?crop=1.00xw:1.00xh;0,0&resize=640:*;

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71MCBmuEhRL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg;

https://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-man-created-god-not-god-man-giuseppe-garibaldi-138-95-85.jpg;

https://play-lh.googleusercontent.com/proxy/MrFWK5sbWUagzh-n9A7aaxm2ahW9p407CWDQXKbcT3pCjPj6luyoxkOUj8ZMZM5HUWULKjoff8v81yytqeNiP3rShCrYhVhKcQ-cEN9EXv7LGRjG4A=s1920-w1920-h1080


And now the Frankensteins of our political culture looms, while rising in the background the AI-hubris of our intelligence raises an abstract threat as deadly as the biological pandemics waiting in the organic weeds for our next over-stepping Frankensteinian, demi-savior of arrogance.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0WoXrokaGKo/W8zzXMoeDzI/AAAAAAAAAI4/7CkulOp_8n8UsY7zlNloXFeCItbRwwjOgCLcBGAs/s1600/Republican-vs-Democrat-Red-and-Blue.jpg;

https://urbeuniversity.edu/post_assets/Le9zsr8bQmv7gmZW40UXiVaPsGcpVwaY65mw28tU.webp;

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2da09439311cc3d1209aa133b74231b1

Hegel conceived the notion of a material phenomena being more than an anecdotal occurrence but a consciousness dialectic confluence of conditions most resonant with those of a ready emotional mindset to act-on-the-knowledge they are acutely aware. In this instance the downward parabolic societal trajectory is enabled by a void of positive, upward vectors of momentum. For those few, who intellectually and viscerally are bearing the brunt of their chosen contrarian dynamics, their angst is the instrument these times of psychological struggle are forging for their Hegelian moment [G.W.F. Hegel saw the reliance on a contradictory process between opposing sides.].

https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/3840x2160/354634-Georg-Wilhelm-Friedrich-Hegel-Quote-Nothing-great-in-the-world-was.jpg

https://www.mdpi.com/ijms/ijms-10-01161/article_deploy/html/images/ijms-10-01161f1-1024.png

Video version

Our intitive 'Sensual Sensing'

Sensual censoring
YouTube

"What we've got here is... a failure to communicate."

Strother Martin portraying the 'Captain' of the chain gang in the Paul Newman headlined movie, 'COOL HAND LUKE' was repeating a line, by which we who've been subordinates to any authority have heard in many threatening versions of that tone. Those versions have come from personal family and acquaintances, as well as institutional and formal authority figures.

A lot of times its more the implicit unspoken and non-verbal structure of the environment that's the metaphoric warning flag of 'If you cross that line..'. That's what those of us without the connections of a mentoring intermediary face as an omnipresent factor of an individual and a co-status we have physically in common with others, proximally, and abstractly in our remotely known, but analogous conditions.

The failure is NOT in the communication, because no communication of other than an imposed understanding had been non-verbally constructed. The words have been said, 'If one of influence you seek to be, then ingratiate yourself with the powers that be..'. For those of us who draw the line of adaptative accommodation beyond the option of our practical survival, the trappings of a 3rd party, facilitated convenience and comfort for the associated trappings of that accommodation are not enough for what we pridefully hold as more tangible-our integrity.

It is with this juxtaposition of contention to not go along with what is explicitly or implicitly a determined construction that becomes our guiding attitude of self-discipline. It is the underlying purpose for the focus of our thoughts for our plans and actions that precipitate from that attitude of a defiant contentious juxtaposition. Even when the environment presents seasons of adverse conditions, the discipline with which we maintain our attitude is the sacred resilience by which we affirm our soul's being.

YouTube version:

ONCE YOU'VE CHOSEN A RENEGADE MINDSET

ONCE YOU'VE CHOSEN A RENEGADE MINDSET

With thanks to Amy Dunne [https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71MaWPfeFRL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg] quote, "In this post-apocalyptic world, you have a choice: survive as a slave or fight for your freedom".

I'm making a broader assertion. The choice is to either survive in some subordinate form to an external cultural narrative or fighting for 'the-expression-of-your soul' and it's freedom is the precursing prologue to any apocalypse in whatever abstract iteration that you may seek to conceive it.

It starts from a willingness to question the particular nuances of the presumed consensual narrative that's passed along. Whether informally within your personal social circle or given as a didactic dictate through the vector of institutional authority, such narratives are given the validity of credibility you've defaulted to the sources: thus allowing the emotional as well as mental subordination to that signaled precept.

With the questioning comes the associated analysis of the presumptive narrative. The inconsistencies found in the narrative that present paradoxical concluding scenarios require your mental untangling of these twines-of-thought that were taken as quasi-sacred cows by you as part of your world view's architecture.

For the sake of your own due diligence of conscientiousness, you begin the deconstruction of that narrative's dialectic, so that it becomes somewhat coherent to your understanding in relation to your own, admittedly limited, knowledge base. In doing the deconstruction with the concurrent reconstruction, you initiate at first the objective fault line riffs from your former way of perceiving the matter. The nuances and contrasts of differences in the fault-line gaps, when revealed incidentally or on purpose to others, starts the separation of the former homogeneous and cohesive bonds of self-identification with the social milieus of those presumptions.

Then you learn that it's more than the circumstantial happenstance of your proximal locale and the characters who comprised the fabric of perception you now find wanting in its validity and applicability. It is the ubiquitous similarity that the now questioned and deconstructed thought is held elsewhere by others in their own social versions. The extensiveness of the similar ubiquity presents for you both the mental and the emotional challenge to your practical existence. Can you exist in a collegial, more than transactional interaction with those who hold ideas with feelings that might as well be tectonic plates bumping in friction against your tectonic plate and that would have a spectrum of eruptions between you and them?

For the sake of an emotional historic continuity with the people and feelings of those former perceptions, you will and do make the effort to have a cohesiveness, at best, and a gracious transactional interaction, otherwise. But the imperatives of logic will make the fault-lines more pronounced between the relative-Frankenstein operations between you and others that have more adversarial and irreconcilable interests that make up the friction and separation of contending tectonic thought.

You, being the minority-of-one, must come to grips with your marginal, tolerated-if at all-ways. Is the integrity of your iconoclasm worth the estrangement. Are the tangible and intangible trappings that you've chosen as your identity worth the social detachment and estrangement from what is only a hollow symbol of your past sentiments? It will involve what defines you as a liberated person of your own self-determination or being a subordinate emotional slave underling to the feelings of others. For that circumstance I'll offer this quote from the Bhagavad Gita Chapter 18, verse 47: 'It is better to do one's own dharma, even though humble and imperfect, than to do another's dharma, even if it's more acknowledged.'

YouTube Version:

IT'S NOT THAT YOU GAVE YOUR WORD;

IT'S NOT THAT YOU GAVE YOUR WORD; IT'S TO WHOM OR WHAT YOU GIVE IT TO!

In an homage to Ernest Borgnine's character, Dutch Engstrom. It's the statement of what the quality of loyalty that is valid. There's something more nuanced than choosing 'The Railroad' or a more sacred icon or idol as a religion and its 'God'.

There's family, about which an ex-brother-in-law had a maxim that ''family' was only an aggregation of not necessarily emotionally cohesive people, whose only common bond is the vaginal canal of their exit or original entrance. It can be applied to other infra-family dynamics, in which the bonds of blood aren't as strong as the petty grievances with their family members.

Such 'oaths of word' can be applied to military and other martial forces. Their oaths to the Constitution includes an oath of obedience to their immediate superiors and to the politician who codified such oaths. With the conflicts that have requisitioned citizens to their constitutional duty and loyalty, and that take advantage of the economic stresses on individuals that oblige a quasi-extortion of enlistment as a packaged deal with the oath of loyalty to the Constitution-the defaulting of one's moral and ethical say to those who have an amoral indifference to those bound by law to that oath.

Equivalent to family are those of our locale, our social class, our cliques, our race, or our religion. What was cohesive at some point in time can diverge and become a disaffection from evolving circumstances. That which was once the equivalent to the bond of blood loyalty to family, devolves to one's physical survival or psychological integrity. One, just like Dutch Engstrom, sees a gulf of purpose and meaning between themselves and the collective that presumes their obedience and loyalty.

AND then there are the abstract oaths we give consciously and subconsciously to ourselves that effect us in intangible ways because we've made them fetishes and habits. We want 'the feel' of the sensual, plus the affluence of the trappings, that we arrange our whole way of being with having either that tangible touch or those intangible trappings as our so-called possessions.

It's an oath on our minds and souls. For the fear of our pride in losing the worth of that bad mindset, we cling to what's insidiously destroying us. Like Dutch alluded to: there are some things that cross the line that damn us.

That self-damning isn't an abstract aesthetic. It's something that will leave it's traces on others and with others, because we knew we sold-out. And for that short-term expedience, we let the shadow of our baggage of life be the darkening burden on other lives.

Video companion:

Passion

PASSION

Let me have the feel that would be the equivalent exhilaration of such young and ravished flesh beneath me! May the feeling of that exhilaration confirm and affirm the utmost vitality I've felt before, so I can grasp, not only by the feel of any of my organs and appendages, but be able to graphically conceive each pulsing beat of my and my lusted-one's heart beats with our panting breaths of excitement releasing our pleasure at the surging, precipitated climactic moment.

As I celebrate the timelessness of that ever indelible moment of mind and body erupting in catharsis, let me feel those extreme apical articulations of that sensational point of mind-numbness in my flashing image-thoughts in that seemingly indefinite stillness of time. I'd have it such that what so arouses my lips and tongue to an undeniable lust, and innervates my fingers-and even my shriveled 3-inch dick-to a barely controllable, impulsiveness of desire and a pre-ejaculatory hallelujahs of emotional gasps: be even better than a feast or birthday done in my honor.

That joy will be that carnal reverie that I'll memorialize and commemorate as a future standard for a state of mind, as well as a jumping-off point for my different dream form dynamics. Those sweet, sensually felt and imagined dynamics being my inspiration and motivation going forward as the forewords of my intent seen in the intense looks my eyes give to others in their startled captivated realization for what I'd do to them, next.

Video: https://shorturl.at/mvETY